Nonsense like "on some streets, latinos were 9 times more likely to be pulled over than whites" use to "prove" racial profiling is a joke. On many streets in AZ, or anywhere else in the southwest, latinos are, in fact, 90% (or more) of the traffic. The allegations of "violence against women" list TWO examples, one involving a white woman and the other a latina woman, hardly in keeping with the racial profiling slant earlier presented, it also conveniently leaves out just when these incidents occured and whether any local action had been taken. The bottom line is that the Obama/Holder DOJ and its liberal friends are, in fact, targetting this state (in any way it can) to get press to 'impress' latino voters that Obama is their friend. The timing of these actions alone is ample 'evidence' of that, after all, Arpaio has been there for lots of years, yet only now gets 'special' federal scrutiny and national press. To assert that this single county in AZ has the worst local law enforcement in the nation, thus deserves the nearly excusive, and repeated federal "civil rights" challenges is more than a bit suspicious to me. Strange that we hear no more on the federal Zimmerman (Sanford PD?) "civil rights" investigation, and that Al, Jesse and the NBP are 'satisfied' that all is back to OK in 'racist' Sanford, FL after the "forced" arrest of a single civilian (could that be because FL is a swing state?), yet the federal "Arpaio must go" campaign is in full swing now, just in time to make Obama look latino friendly, by picking on a red state he will lose anyway. Yes he can!
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman