Page 16 of 22 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 214

Thread: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

  1. #151
    Professor
    vendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    06-05-13 @ 08:35 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,250

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by Somerville View Post
    Can you provide a legal citation for the difference between "detention" and "arrest"? I do agree that holding someone in the back of a patrol car for an hour or so would be "detention". However I would hold that taking a person to a detention facility, stripping, frisking, photographing and then holding for even 24 hours would constitute an arrest.
    Where are you coming up with these numbers and how is it relevant to what you posted about supposedly "arresting brown people".

  2. #152
    Death2Globalists Matt Foley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ExecuteTheTraitors
    Last Seen
    11-24-12 @ 12:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,574

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by lpast View Post
    Doubtful Old joe will lose the election...
    Well he is getting "older", and I looked at the numbers, in each consecutive election he keeps losing like 5% of the vote. When he gets replaced property values are gonna plummet and taxes are gonna go up to pay for building new 5 star prisons.

  3. #153
    Death2Globalists Matt Foley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ExecuteTheTraitors
    Last Seen
    11-24-12 @ 12:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,574

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by teamosil View Post
    Ethnicity has all the same moral and legal protections that races do, so not sure what your point is. People use the term "racial profiling" to encompass both.
    Hey I like that, "Hispanic is not a race." We can rename racial profiling to facial profiling. And it rhymes too, lol.

  4. #154
    Sage
    Somerville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    On an island. Not that one!
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:28 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    9,843

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by vendur View Post
    Where are you coming up with these numbers and how is it relevant to what you posted about supposedly "arresting brown people".

    Maybe you should read earlier posts before commenting?
    “And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
    ~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822

  5. #155
    Death2Globalists Matt Foley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ExecuteTheTraitors
    Last Seen
    11-24-12 @ 12:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,574

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by teamosil View Post
    Actually, its more complicated than that. There are rights the constitution grants to citizens only. For example, the 14th amendment reads "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States".

    Then there are rights that the constitution grants to all people, regardless of whether they are citizens or here legally or anything. For example, the 5th amendment reads "No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".
    That's nice, but a Chinese citizen cannot sue the Chinese government for depriving them of "life, liberty, or property, without due process". That's just silly talk.

  6. #156
    Death2Globalists Matt Foley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ExecuteTheTraitors
    Last Seen
    11-24-12 @ 12:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,574

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by Aderleth View Post
    I'm not aware of any such rights. Just like the Constitution is not exclusive to US citizens. This is a common misconception. Again: you've convinced yourself that's the case, can you back it up with anything? Anything at all? (hint: the answer is no, because it's not true)
    The Constitution is exclusive to US Citizens, globalist.

  7. #157
    Professor
    vendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    06-05-13 @ 08:35 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,250

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by Somerville View Post
    Maybe you should read earlier posts before commenting?
    Oh, it was just a red herring because I totally destroyed your point and you had nothing else to say relevant. Ok, gotcha.

  8. #158
    Sage
    teamosil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Last Seen
    05-22-14 @ 12:47 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    6,623

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Foley View Post
    That's nice, but a Chinese citizen cannot sue the Chinese government for depriving them of "life, liberty, or property, without due process". That's just silly talk.
    No of course not. The constitution deals with the goings on within the US and the actions of the US government no matter where it acts.
    Total tax rates- People living in poverty: 16.2%. The median American: 27%. Working people who make over $140k/year: 31%. The top 1%: 30%. Super rich investors: around 15%. Help the democrats retake the house.

  9. #159
    Sage
    Somerville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    On an island. Not that one!
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:28 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    9,843

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Originally Posted by teamosil
    Actually, its more complicated than that. There are rights the constitution grants to citizens only. For example, the 14th amendment reads "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States".

    Then there are rights that the constitution grants to all people, regardless of whether they are citizens or here legally or anything. For example, the 5th amendment reads "No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".

    To which we read the following reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Foley View Post
    That's nice, but a Chinese citizen cannot sue the Chinese government for depriving them of "life, liberty, or property, without due process". That's just silly talk.

    followed at 5:00 PM, also from Matt Foley
    The Constitution is exclusive to US Citizens, globalist.
    The last comment would appear to indicate the commenter didn't actually bother to read the citation in teamosil's comment - You know - that part about "No person ..."

    For some reason, I do not believe that Matt Foley is a constitutional scholar.
    “And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
    ~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822

  10. #160
    Guru
    Aderleth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    04-08-16 @ 06:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    4,294

    Re: Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Foley View Post
    The Constitution is exclusive to US Citizens, globalist.
    And you're basing this assertion on what, exactly?

Page 16 of 22 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •