"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius
And the perhaps not even legal is the basis of the lawsuit.Originally Posted by Baralis
6. This Complaint sets out three categories of unlawful conduct: (1) a pattern or practice of discriminatory and otherwise unconstitutional law enforcement actions against Latinos in Maricopa County; (2) discriminatory jail practices against Latino prisoners with limited English language skills; and (3) a pattern or practice of retaliatory actions against perceived critics of MCSO activities.
7. This action is brought to enforce the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution; the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 14141; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-7; the Title VI implementing regulations issued by the United States Department of Justice, 28 C.F.R. §§ 42.101 to 42.112; and Title VI contractual assurances.
“I’m worried that I will be the last Republican president.” - George W. Bush
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
It means that illegals aren't subject to any juristiction, they are outside the law.I'm not sure what you think this proves. If you're trying to argue that people in the US illegally aren't afforded Bill of Rights protections, you're wrong, and pretty much every case ever on this issue will demonstrate as much.
The American Constitution is for American citizens.So I was right. You are making the entirely specious argument that people entering the country illegally aren't entitled to the protections of the Constitution. I'm assuming you can back this up with actual evidence? Caselaw, perhaps?
What you globalist propose is as lame as some Chinese citizen suing the Chinese government for violating their Right to Bear Arms cause it's in the US Constitution.
Based on that reasoning a United States citizen cannot demand Chinese rights and privileges that are exclusive to Chinese nationals in China.Again: Surely you have some kind of evidence to back up this claim. It cannot possibly be the case that you're just talking entirely out of your ass... right?
Based on that reasoning, I'm assuming that you also believe a US citizen in China is subject exclusively to US law?