• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town

Time to flush this racist turd down the toilet. I can't believe someone in that community hasn't taken him out already. He's a bastard tyrant and deserves to die in jail for all his abuses of power.

I'm a "moderate" and I totally believe that anyone who supports the law of the united states of america is a racist turd!
 
Time to flush this racist turd down the toilet. I can't believe someone in that community hasn't taken him out already. He's a bastard tyrant and deserves to die in jail for all his abuses of power.

See the spittle fly out the side of their mouths as they spew their hatred towards anyone (usually whites) who dares to act counter to political correctness.
 
All of its alleged. So until a jury says otherwise its all just hearsay.

Ummm... not hearsay. Please don't use words you don't understand. It damages your credibility.
 
A few days after the “Toughest Sheriff in America” oversaw his 60th Latino-harassing raid in the Phoenix area, the Obama administration’s top civil-rights lawyer flew to Phoenix and slappedSheriff Joe Arpaio and his office with a monumental civil-rights tort alleging rampant constitutional abuses, including widespread racial profiling of Latinos. The suit also claims the sheriff violated the civil rights of his critics by “illegal retaliation” that included baseless lawsuits and meritless administrative actions.



Arpaio Faces a New Sheriff in Town - Yahoo! News


The suit also claims the sheriff violated the civil rights of his critics by “illegal retaliation” that included baseless lawsuits and meritless administrative actions.

ROFLMAO!

So the "Justice" Department is engaging in the very same practice as they allege the Sheriff is conducting.

Now that's just too funny.
 
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is “not done” to say it, just as in mid-Victorian times it was “not done” to mention trousers in the presence of a lady. Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the highbrow periodicals." - George Orwell

That orthodoxy = globalism.

The controlled opposition tries to paint globalism as some sort of conspiracy theory like the NAFTA superhighway, or black helicopter, but the simple reality is that globalism simply means Free Trade and Open Borders.

The Liberals aren't Liberals, they are Conservatives, Conservatives want to maintain the status quo.
 
Last edited:
ROFLMAO!

So the "Justice" Department is engaging in the very same practice as they allege the Sheriff is conducting.

Now that's just too funny.
What has the DOJ done illegally against Sheriff Joke?

Interesting factoid:

"From 2004 through November 2007, Arpaio was the target of 2,150 lawsuits in U.S. District Court and hundreds more in Maricopa County courts, with more than $50 million in claims being filed,[70] 50 times as many prison-conditions lawsuits as the New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston jail systems combined."
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
What has the DOJ done illegally against Sheriff Joke?

Interesting factoid:

"From 2004 through November 2007, Arpaio was the target of 2,150 lawsuits in U.S. District Court and hundreds more in Maricopa County courts, with more than $50 million in claims being filed,[70] 50 times as many prison-conditions lawsuits as the New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston jail systems combined."
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The globalists scum sure want their way.
 
More BS.

So many people seem to get their panties in a knot over profiling. Heres an idea people, if you really don't like "racial" profiling, the simple solution is make it not work. Perhaps, I don't know, say help the police catch criminals in your community istead of harrassing them when they try to. The reason "racial" profiling keeps popping up is because it is an effective tool for police. If the communities that may end up being profiled worked together and with police to clean up criminals in their communities, then "racial" profiling will eventually disapear because it won't work anymore and then only truely racists officers will use it.

I have no problem with his enforcement of laws, in fact, I would very much welcome someone like him in my own county. All law enforcement officers, regardless of the level they are hired at should enforce all laws, not just the ones at their level. In all other areas of law enforcement, the Feds have few problem seeking and receiving help from local law enforcement. I doubt very much if a local officer arrests a peson from the FBI's most wanted list who didn't commit any crimes locally is going to be censured and disciplined for doing so, but if they run accross an illegal immigrant, all hell breaks lose if the local officer acts. This is just plain stupid, entering the US without proper documentation and authorization is a crime.

All Illegal Immigrants are criminals, even if they commit no other crime, they have commited a criminal act by illegally entering the US. All Law Enforcement personnel and agencies have the responsibility to Enforce Laws, all laws. In Arizona, it would be impossible to enforce immigration laws without it being very heavily biased towards Hispanics. Some call it racial profiling because it is heavily biased towards Hispanics, but, except for a few Chinese and other Asians that come in through California, pretty much all of the arrest of illegal immigrants are going to be Hispanic in Arizona.
That's all well and good, unless your surname is Garcia and you are a Chicano. Getting pulled over and shaken down every Saturday night just so that the Police can use racial profiling as an effective tool is going to eventually piss you off. But hey, since your last name is Mudd, you may keep your panties knot free.
 
Nonsense like "on some streets, latinos were 9 times more likely to be pulled over than whites" use to "prove" racial profiling is a joke. On many streets in AZ, or anywhere else in the southwest, latinos are, in fact, 90% (or more) of the traffic. The allegations of "violence against women" list TWO examples, one involving a white woman and the other a latina woman, hardly in keeping with the racial profiling slant earlier presented, it also conveniently leaves out just when these incidents occured and whether any local action had been taken. The bottom line is that the Obama/Holder DOJ and its liberal friends are, in fact, targetting this state (in any way it can) to get press to 'impress' latino voters that Obama is their friend. The timing of these actions alone is ample 'evidence' of that, after all, Arpaio has been there for lots of years, yet only now gets 'special' federal scrutiny and national press. To assert that this single county in AZ has the worst local law enforcement in the nation, thus deserves the nearly excusive, and repeated federal "civil rights" challenges is more than a bit suspicious to me. Strange that we hear no more on the federal Zimmerman (Sanford PD?) "civil rights" investigation, and that Al, Jesse and the NBP are 'satisfied' that all is back to OK in 'racist' Sanford, FL after the "forced" arrest of a single civilian (could that be because FL is a swing state?), yet the federal "Arpaio must go" campaign is in full swing now, just in time to make Obama look latino friendly, by picking on a red state he will lose anyway. Yes he can!
 
Nonsense like "on some streets, latinos were 9 times more likely to be pulled over than whites" use to "prove" racial profiling is a joke. On many streets in AZ, or anywhere else in the southwest, latinos are, in fact, 90% (or more) of the traffic.

Obviously they control for that dude... Duh.
 
Back
Top Bottom