"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos
Earlier this week David Axlerod said Obama's position was on Gay marriage was "evolving"." are factual, not speculation.
I know what the definition is, which after watching you post for a while, is why I said you are lying when you claim that is what you are.Buy a dictionary and look up the word 'moderate'.
You were guess on what it all meant.
I know what the definition is, which after watching you post for a while, is why I said you are lying when you claim that is what you are.
Apparently you don't have a clue about what moderate means. Why would a moderate NOT support President Obama, given the other choice of the GOP moving away from center?
BTW - how many posts of mine have you read. Stick around, you may learn something.
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”
― Stephen R. Covey
Did Obama really do the right thing? One has to remember that the whole "gay" vs. "straight" idea is being discredited and queer theory is emerging as the new way to think about sexuality.
IMHO, these labels--"gay" and "straight", which are supposed to be only temporary, are doing more damage than good. When people lock themselves into labels that don't do justice to their true nature, they'll just end up limiting themselves.
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith