• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Congress' intelligence heads: Taliban stronger

I think the bigger question is why are you still talking about this Hussein guy? If you mean Barack Obama, why are you so unable to call him by name?


IMO, he's likely a bigot and xenophobe, obsessed with associating Obama with "the other" or the "non-white"....
 
1. I am pointing out that Democrats love to start wars and when the going gets tough they want to cut and run.
Good god you are such a hack. You do realize we pulled out of Vietnam under NIXON a republican. NIXON put forth the policy of Vietminization... So apparently in your book Republicans must not like to finish wars either....
By the time you get past the Democrats and Republicans have a lot in similiar then you can finally stop your bs posts...

2. see my last post on that talking point.....
What that your a partisan hack?
 
IMO, he's likely a bigot and xenophobe, obsessed with associating Obama with "the other" or the "non-white"....

I do get them mixed up, they are so alike........:wink2:
 
Good god you are such a hack. You do realize we pulled out of Vietnam under NIXON a republican. NIXON put forth the policy of Vietminization... So apparently in your book Republicans must not like to finish wars either....
By the time you get past the Democrats and Republicans have a lot in similiar then you can finally stop your bs posts...


What that your a partisan hack?

1. Nixon, a republican stopped the war......

2. after several of my friends got killed in Nam its safe to say I am a partisan hack............You should find your way to my Fleet Reserve Association lodge sometime and tell my shipmates who believe as I do who also lost friends in Nam names.....
 
Actually Vietnam was a colony of France andwhat they did is not what we are talking about.......

Well they were the ones that started the war. At first FDR's anti imperialist policy in Vietnam was dropped under Eisenhower and we started to support the French in their imperalist policeis mainly because supposedly we needed their support against the USSR and Chinese, and also because French had a strong communist party and that scared the **** out of use. Then our OSS agents there who were originally on the side of the Vietnamese supporting Ho Chi Minh fighting against Vichy France and the Japanese dropped support for them which pissed Ho off. Then we started to send helicopters and **** back in the 1950's..
 
Wasn't it NPs people that originally trained the Afghans to resist an occupying force?

Hows that working out for you now NP?




Arm the rebels and then fight the rebels?
 
If someone is suffering, you help them. When you have a regime mass slaughtering millions vs an american who has stand in line for a free lunch the choice should be made to help the millions dying vs the the people who are inconvienced by the hand outs they are receiving. Given the resources our country (and other wealthy nations) have there is no reason why it is a choice of either/or.

That includes Africa, South America, Asia, Middle East, etc. The simple fact is, we can't be in all of those places, so how do you prioritize and what are you willing to sacrifice both in lives and money to accomplish this and for how long?

To quote hatuey,

Well I'm not hatuey.

I am about helping the poor around the world and here in America. Everyone in the world should have a basic standard of living. Just because a person is closer to being the same as you than someone else does not make them more important. Today's world is segregated by hatred and uncaring for people who are different. Only caring about Americans is no better than only caring about whites. Or only caring about Christians. ect.


As I said before, I'm not against helping others, but I believe in helping Americans first. It is especially disturbing that we have poor, homeless, unemployment, yet we send BILLIONS of dollars across the globe in aid to others.
 
1. Nixon, a republican stopped the war......
Yea i know that is my point. You claimed Democrats always end the wars we can win. Well this was a Republican. He is a chicken **** then right!?


2. after several of my friends got killed in Nam its safe to say I am a partisan hack............You should find your way to my Fleet Reserve Association lodge sometime and tell my shipmates who believe as I do who also lost friends in Nam names.....

Ok sense you fought in the military i have no right to call things how i see them? Its a damn shame that that happened but i just call things how i see them. Everything with a R next to his name is good no matter what and everything with a D next to his name is bad no matter what.
 
Wasn't it NPs people that originally trained the Afghans to resist an occupying force?

Hows that working out for you now NP?


Arm the rebels and then fight the rebels?

If Hussein Obama would listen to the Cdrs in the field and not the far left it would be going a lot better my left wing friend.
 
Yea i know that is my point. You claimed Democrats always end the wars we can win. Well this was a Republican. He is a chicken **** then right!?




Ok sense you fought in the military i have no right to call things how i see them? Its a damn shame that that happened but i just call things how i see them. Everything with a R next to his name is good no matter what and everything with a D next to his name is bad no matter what.

Not true, sadly there are a lot of RINOS in the Republican Party...That is why I am not a registered Republican.....
 
Not true, sadly there are a lot of RINOS in the Republican Party...That is why I am not a registered Republican.....

All your posts on this forum say otherwise.....

But still come on what about Nixon!? Chicken **** right!? We could of won. Where is the criticism?
 
IMO, he's likely a bigot and xenophobe, obsessed with associating Obama with "the other" or the "non-white"....

Hey don't forget racist and homophobe two of you far left peoples favorite words
 
All your posts on this forum say otherwise.....

But still come on what about Nixon!? Chicken **** right!? We could of won. Where is the criticism?

Kissinger SEC of State to Nixon negotiated the cease fire in Nam............
 
So we should have just let France sort their own **** out then.

I think we are talking about two different times....The French left Nam in 1954 and we officially entered the war after the Tonkin Golf incident in1964.........You really need to do your homework
 
I think we are talking about two different times....The French left Nam in 1954 and we officially entered the war after the Tonkin Golf incident in1964.........You really need to do your homework
US started to get involved in Vietnam with the OSS in WW2 on the side of Ho Chi Minh. We then started to support the French militarily under Truman...
 
I think we are talking about two different times....The French left Nam in 1954 and we officially entered the war after the Tonkin Golf incident in1964.........You really need to do your homework

So the French ****ed up, had to surrender, and a year later we had to go clean up the mess they left.
 
I am trying to figure out what the hell your talking about?

Earlier you claimed we could of won Vietnam if it wasnt for those damn lefties.. Well guess who ended the War a REPUBLICAN. Where is the criticism (more proof of the partisan)?
 
The people that count take me seriously....The rest of you lefties I could care less

Like I said the Gov. in Iraq is not perfect but its a hell of a lot better then it was under Saddam Hussein and a thousand times better the Afganistan..

Let's see: there is you, and....

Well, you take your posts seriously I guess, so that is something. Even our most partisan people don't play juvenile hackish games like you do. Something to take pride in.
 
That includes Africa, South America, Asia, Middle East, etc. The simple fact is, we can't be in all of those places, ?

If the well off and civilized nations of the world, the rich if you will, came together to stop the genocides and starvations around world you wouldn't need to prioritize. But thats not happening. Everyone is far too concerned with themselves.
so how do you prioritize and what are you willing to sacrifice both in lives and money to accomplish this and for how long

I dont put a monetary value on life. When it boils down to life vs money I'll take life every time. As far as lives, I dont believe anyone should be forced to fight. But I also think a well funded global initiative to end starvation and stop some of these horrific regimes would muster plenty of volunteers.

Well I'm not hatuey.

No, thankfully you are not. But you used the word WE previously when replying to something I said to Hatuey

It is especially disturbing that we have poor, homeless, unemployment, yet we send BILLIONS of dollars across the globe in aid to others.

Being poor in the US does not have the same meaning as being poor elsewhere. A poor person in America has means to eat and get warm in many cases. Billions of dollars is going overseas but much of it is going to governments and is not having the effect it could and should.
 
Let's see: there is you, and....

Well, you take your posts seriously I guess, so that is something. Even our most partisan people don't play juvenile hackish games like you do. Something to take pride in.

Go look in my account at my friends......I see you have visited my account before Redress.......
 
Earlier you claimed we could of won Vietnam if it wasnt for those damn lefties.. Well guess who ended the War a REPUBLICAN. Where is the criticism (more proof of the partisan)?

If LBJ and his cronnies we could have won that war in two weeks.........we had 500,000 men there...........
 
Back
Top Bottom