We appear to be talking past each other. An accusation was made that Media Matters was created for the "specific purpose" of attacking Fox News, I noted that it also criticises other media outlets, thereby negating the "specific purpose" attack. The reply then notes that Media Matters was formed for the "correction of conservative misinformation", which if one were to follow the sequence of posts would apparently indicate the poster believes only FoxNews is conservative and therefore Media Matters only attacks FoxNews. to which I say - huh?Quote Originally Posted by Somerville View Post
Hmmm, I post an accurate statement contradicting an earlier one about "specific purpose" of Media Matters and instead of admitting "OK - so Media Matters does post criticism of other media outlets" Nope, I supposedly have my "head buried in the sand" and therefore - no matter how truthful my words may be, they are meaningless.
Got it. Facts are not to be used in arguments with righties.