• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Photos show U.S. GIs posing with dead Afghans[W:1146]

Ok, that's true, but wouldn't it also be true that if there is starting to be new evidence, that this wouldn't be published, or known by us until it is long down the path to broad based acceptance? In that case there could be evidence of that now, but it would take time to overturn conventional thinking on the matter....

j-mac

Is this a hypothetical?

Among scientists, new undeniable facts can change the conventional wisdom pretty quickly. New dinosaur finds, for example, changed paleontologists minds about birds having descended from dinosaurs very quickly. Among the general public, who may or may not have even a basic understanding of science, new facts and observations take a very long time to be widely accepted, if ever. There still are people who are trying to deny that the theory evolution is even correct at all.

So, yes, new facts coming to light about how oil is produced would change the science texts pretty quickly. Conventional wisdom among the public, maybe not so much.
 
And just when I thought you were becoming reasonable with your discussion between you and MSgt. You may think what you want, that doesn't make it fact just because you think it.

j-mac

I am always reasonable with reasonable people. You started out with an unreasonable assertion. See the connection? ;)
 
When did this thread go to oil idiocy?

The fact is....If it were not for oil, most of the ME would have no income whatsoever. Israel, with no oil, has a population of about 8 million and a GDP of about $180 billion. Why? Because they make **** that people buy. The Muslim ME exports oil and terrorism. That's it
 
I am always reasonable with reasonable people. You started out with an unreasonable assertion. See the connection? ;)


Are you kidding? they call me Mr. Reasonable....:mrgreen:


j-mac
 
Well, we have evidence that humans can create oil in a matter of days....

Yes, we do, and doing so is one of the ways we could work toward energy independence. We can't wait around for nature to do the job, now can we?
 
What are you guys even arguing about? Oil is running out.
 
Yes, we do, and doing so is one of the ways we could work toward energy independence. We can't wait around for nature to do the job, now can we?

I dunno? Can we? How long does it take?

Anyways, we've done enough to hurt the planet...we might as well help it out when we can.
 
What are you guys even arguing about? Oil is running out.

Maybe. The reality is there is much more unattainable oil down there that we can't get now...but will be able to when our technology advances.
 
I dunno? Can we? How long does it take?

Anyways, we've done enough to hurt the planet...we might as well help it out when we can.

According to this, it can be done pretty quickly:

The smell is a mélange of midsummer corpse with fried-liver overtones and a distinct fecal note. It comes from the worst stuff in the world—turkey slaughterhouse waste. Rotting heads, gnarled feet, slimy intestines, and lungs swollen with putrid gases have been trucked here from a local Butterball packager and dumped into an 80-foot-long hopper with a sickening glorp. In about 20 minutes, the awful mess disappears into the workings of the thermal conversion process plant in Carthage, Missouri.

Two hours later a much cleaner truck—an oil carrier—pulls up to the other end of the plant, and the driver attaches a hose to the truck's intake valve. One hundred fifty barrels of fuel oil, worth $12,600 wholesale, gush into the truck, headed for an oil company that will blend it with heavier fossil-fuel oils to upgrade the stock

Of course, there's always a hitch, and in this case the hitch was that the process was more expensive than anticipated. Still, if costs can be brought down and/or if petroleum continues to go up in price, we just might see plants like this all over the country.
 
According to this, it can be done pretty quickly:

Why that sounds lovely :)

Of course, there's always a hitch, and in this case the hitch was that the process was more expensive than anticipated. Still, if costs can be brought down and/or if petroleum continues to go up in price, we just might see plants like this all over the country.

Yeah, I read elsewhere that the original costs were based on cheap source material. Of course, soon as farmers discovered the waste had value...they began charging for it. I've also read that all organic and recyclable waste, including plastics can be used in similar processes. That's awesome.
 
You are preaching to the choir. How do you think a guy like me feels about these matters? Afghanistan was always the "Vietnam." It was never Iraq. Pakistan has revealed itself to be a true enemy to us on many levels, yet we continue to cut annual allowance to them and call them an ally. Almost half of the men killed in Afghanistan this year have been from cops who have turned on their handlers, yet we ctaer to Karzai's accusations and demands for annual money. Saudi Arabia is the source of hatred for most Arab radicals and serve to remind the faithful why they are supposed to hate everything except the House of Saud, yet we keep them in business and call them friends. I'm not confused.


I am one of those who see our enemy throughout the region between Cairo and Islamabad. I also believe that like 9/11, Osama Bin Laden is merely a symptom of a larger disease. My enemy is that radical parent who teaches his children that Israel and the West is the culprit for all their problems. My enemy is the complete lack of general education throughout a region. My enemy is also a piece of Islam that is set so deeply in brittle concrete that it strangles the life blood out of families and society as their leaders use oil money for personal subsistance. But identifying the sysmptoms is more manageable isn't it? Putting a terrorist face to the event is far easier on the politics than accusing a failed civilization of it's inability to contribute to the modern world. We ignore the countless religious organizations throughout the region with members that hail from all over the region declaring grievances about everything from the existance of Islrael, to the West's intrusion on their cultures, to Japan's Pokemon as a character that leades children away from God. And make no mistake, the Middle East is getting worse. This "Arab Spring" may be the last effort of a people to reverse the path they are on. Of course, if they fail and prove to the world that a civilization of Arabs are unable to function in the modern world while keeping their brand of Islam unchanged, then they will lose the little bit of sympathy that too much of the world offers them today.

As far as "nation building," I also believe in the British's tactic of old called "punitive strikes." Nation building works only if the population gets behind it for its own good. Obvious examples were Germany and Japan. But we aren't dealing with such civilized societies these days are we? The Middle East offers us societies that are struggling greatly with terms such as Nationalism, Democracy, Religion vs. State, Dictator, Caliphate, etc. You can't nation build a nation that is absolutely conflicted about what it wants. But we can simply punish and move on.






Well, many innocent people die in war.

Extremely well written and entirely accurate. Thank you
 
Maybe. The reality is there is much more unattainable oil down there that we can't get now...but will be able to when our technology advances.


Sure and then we will tap that dry. What took millions to billions of years to create is being used over the course of a few hundred years with an escallation of use. It will run out. I say tap theirs before we tap ours.
 
Last edited:
Sure and then we will tap that dry.

Maybe, we don't really know how much is down there nor do we really know how quickly it replenishes.

What took millions to billions of years to create is being used over the course of a few hundred years with an escallation of use. It will run out. I say tap theirs before we tap ours.

The entirety of the reserves may have taken billions of years to create, but you don't have any idea how long one drop takes to be created.
 
Maybe, we don't really know how much is down there nor do we really know how quickly it replenishes.

We know it came from dinosaurs and other such pressurized carbon. We also know that it takes an extremely long time to pressurize. It's just like diamonds. Eventually we will exhaust the finds because there is no replenishing without enormous amounts of time.


The entirety of the reserves may have taken billions of years to create, but you don't have any idea how long one drop takes to be created.

Our world needs seas of oil. One drop is useless.
 
We know it came from dinosaurs and other such pressurized carbon. We also know that it takes an extremely long time to pressurize. It's just like diamonds. Eventually we will exhaust the finds because there is no replenishing without enormous amounts of time.

It's more likely that it comes from decayed plant life.
Where does oil really come from?


Our world needs seas of oil. One drop is useless.

The point is we don't know how fast it replenishes....how it replenishes, or if it replenishes.
 
The point is we don't know how fast it replenishes....how it replenishes, or if it replenishes.

the russians are claiming that many of their "pumped dry" oil fields have shown signs of regenerating. and it hasn't been millions of years since they drained them.
 
the russians are claiming that many of their "pumped dry" oil fields have shown signs of regenerating. and it hasn't been millions of years since they drained them.

The same has happened in other places...production seemed to be dropping but then picked back up later. As much as we like to pat ourselves on the back...we don't know everything yet.
 
No, it's not what you've been talking about. You started this off with "the middle east has the majority of the cheap oil"....just not true. It has a lot, but not most.

I've shown the facts that say they do.

The peak thing is a myth, too.

Again, I've got to go with the facts and the warning in 2010 from the largest oil user entity on the planet, the US Military.

BTW....how much does Afghanistan have?

Have you never heard of the plans for the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline?
 
Maybe. The reality is there is much more unattainable oil down there that we can't get now...but will be able to when our technology advances.


Putting aside for a second the current cost of extraction and refining of the muck they call shale oil and gas, you are ignoring the detrimental effects to the environment of continued dependence on fossil fuel burning for energy.
 
Putting aside for a second the current cost of extraction and refining of the muck they call shale oil and gas, you are ignoring the detrimental effects to the environment of continued dependence on fossil fuel burning for energy.

I was wondering how long it would take before someone started squealing about global warming
 
Putting aside for a second the current cost of extraction and refining of the muck they call shale oil and gas, you are ignoring the detrimental effects to the environment of continued dependence on fossil fuel burning for energy.

Actually pollution and global warming was not part of the discussion. I'm certainly not ignoring it, it just didn't relate to your "fight for oil" argument.
 
Back
Top Bottom