• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Photos show U.S. GIs posing with dead Afghans[W:1146]

So you agree it was a mistake and now wish to establish blame?

Vietnam was ridiculous for any reason other than supporting allies. Even in that case...it was mostly ridiculous. I;m not trying to establish blame....just ruling out the "warmonger" crap you extreme lefties through around.
 
Catawba...what democracy has returned to dictatorship?

Please do grow a pair and give an honest answer.


I've told you twice now. You first have to come up with a Democracy we created that is not corrupt and can stand on its own without our protection.

Otherwise, its no better than a dictatorship and more costly to US taxpayers.
 
Catawba, what makes you refer to the US as a "hegamony"?


j-mac
 
And we haven't because....?

Most of the world's remaining cheap oil reserves are in the middle east.



What about the UK? Germany? Italy? Austria? Demark? What do you consider "modern"? In all that history....what two democracies have gone to war against each other?


again...balls...

You seem to be obsessed with balls............. Just sayin'...................


Karzai has said that Afghanistan (which you deem a Democracy success story) would stand with Pakistan in a war with the US. The "Democratic" government in Iraq kicked our military out of the country, despite our pleas to stay.
 
I've told you twice now. You first have to come up with a Democracy we created that is not corrupt and can stand on its own without our protection.

Otherwise, its no better than a dictatorship and more costly to US taxpayers.

What's this "we created" crap? Name any two democracies that we have created or did not create that went to war against each other. This really should not be hard for you to do...right?
 
What's this "we created" crap? Name any two democracies that we have created or did not create that went to war against each other. This really should not be hard for you to do...right?

the West is responsible for the birth of both Lebanon and Israel.
 
Catawba, what makes you refer to the US as a "hegamony"?


j-mac

I'm not talking about the US as a "hegamony", I'm talking about our military actions to establish hegemony throughout the world.


Look it up.
 
Most of the world's remaining cheap oil reserves are in the middle east.

Actually....of the top 10, 5 are in the middle east, 5 are not.

You seem to be obsessed with balls............. Just sayin'...................

Mine are large, I expect others' to be...or go home.
 
Last edited:
the West is responsible for the birth of both Lebanon and Israel.


Hmmm....Interesting. I had no idea that "the West" (Code for evul America) was involved with civilizations that predate Jesus.


j-mac
 
I'm not talking about the US as a "hegamony", I'm talking about our military actions to establish hegemony throughout the world.


Look it up.

I have, and it still doesn't fit...So I have to ask what definition you'd like me to refer to....


j-mac
 
LOL!! Are we not a democratic nation? We are the most warring nation in modern history!!!

Sorry I don't support military force used to establish hegemony. That is the one thing I agree with Ron Paul, our military use should be used for defense, not offense.

It's interesting how many here at DP who disagree over most other things have expressed that same opinion.
 
Oh come on....:roll: What's he going to say? 'They are great guys'? 'Yeah, I saw that before, no big deal'?


Don't you have anything better than that to respond?


j-mac

I thought that he would say that he was lucky that he was just outside the photo and didn't get caught...
 
I've told you twice now. You first have to come up with a Democracy we created that is not corrupt and can stand on its own without our protection.

Otherwise, its no better than a dictatorship and more costly to US taxpayers.

Sure....

While Japan and Germany were the last complete builds, we've been fairly successful at remodeling, not least in Latin America. Colombia will be a success eventually if we don't give up on them. El Salvador, Panama after Just Cause.
 
You don't know what you think?

I asked for what YOU think, not what you think of what the author of the article was thinking....Don't you see the difference?


j-mac
Another silly response on your part. You completely miss what is being said by several planets. I just don't think random thoughts are not all that informative. To voice an opinion on a subject have this radical idea that I should have some information on it. You think this is unreasonable?
 
Actually....of the top 10, 5 are in the middle east, 5 are not.

Please pay attention, I said nothing about the top 10. I said, "Most of the world's remaining cheap oil reserves are in the middle east."


Mine are large

TMI (too much information).
 
I have, and it still doesn't fit...So I have to ask what definition you'd like me to refer to....


j-mac

Hegemony definition:

"1: preponderant influence or authority over others : domination <battled for hegemony in Asia>"
 
Sure....

While Japan and Germany were the last complete builds, we've been fairly successful at remodeling, not least in Latin America. Colombia will be a success eventually if we don't give up on them. El Salvador, Panama after Just Cause.

You ignored this part - "and can stand on its own without our protection."
 
Since you can provide no evidence of the military ever condemning a sailor for having a hangover, it would seem your comparison is moot.

hell, I was the one that wrote him up and sent him to get confirmed so he could be brought up on charges.
 
hell, I was the one that wrote him up and sent him to get confirmed so he could be brought up on charges.

Who, and you say his actions were publicly condemned by the military as the actions in this case were?
 
Who, and you say his actions were publicly condemned by the military as the actions in this case were?

he showed up for duty still drunk. I was his NCO, put him up on charges, drove him to the docs' to get the paperwork and the confirming bloodtest, and he went up before The Man who stripped his rank and pay.
 
he showed up for duty still drunk. I was his NCO, put him up on charges, drove him to the docs' to get the paperwork and the confirming bloodtest, and he went up before The Man who stripped his rank and pay.

If his actions endangered his fellow troops and put at risk a decade long mission, I would say he got off easy.
 
Another silly response on your part. You completely miss what is being said by several planets. I just don't think random thoughts are not all that informative. To voice an opinion on a subject have this radical idea that I should have some information on it. You think this is unreasonable?

Maybe not unreasonable, but certainly radical. People on this forum voice opinions on subjects about which they have no information quite regularly.
 
Back
Top Bottom