Right. Every Demo/Libby operative who could draw a breath would be screaming at the top of their lungs about the "mean spirited Repubs picking on Ms Obama", until they passed out. And they'd dine on this until the elections.
And I'm sure they wouldn't see it as a "faux outrage" either.
[QUOTE=hazlnut;1060391454][SIZE=3][B]FOR THE RECORD:
Hilary Rosen works for CNN.
Who visited the WH 30 times. Maybe she was there for the tour, huh?
I was kinda amazed that the poster found he/she couldn't vote for a average working woman, nor a stay at home woman. Nothing seems to satisfy her. Maybe he/she just doesn't like women.
And she gets paid to be a pundit on CNN.
Let's figure out what that means.... She... works... for... CNN. Period.
Since you have all the info, you tell us what she did there on each visit.She is listed as visiting the WH 30 times. What was she there for tea?
Who was paying her salary on her most recent visit???
She works for CNN.
Stop clinging to the Fox News lie.
It's getting embarrassing. I'm embarrassed for you.
Can she be a volunteer?
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the ******* irony in that." - Justin Halpern
You have to admit the irony, though - republicans put an immense amout of power and prestige into 'working' and 'being employed'
"our founding fathers worked hard to build this country . . . ingenuity and hard work!"
But they're willing to give exception to someone's wife because he's rich. . . it's ok - then - not be gainfully employed on your own if your husband's well off (don't just apply that to Ann - I'm sure it applies ot all wives or husbands of well-off spouses who are given a 'get out of this standard we expect everyone ot live up to and judge everyone who's poor when they don't' card)
Oddly though - I thought surely since I read about Ann and found she's been *quite* busy with a large variety of organizations and volunteer *full time* positions (one was volunteer for otherwise paid-for work because the organization's budget was too tight, which is quite generous of her) - but when my husband watched Fox News this morning i listened in and didn't hear ANYONE actually stand pu for her and argue that she's done *work* - she just hasn't been given a paycheck for it.
Where was the defense? Everyone was cackling about how she has MS and cancer - which she developed in 1998 - no one discussed what she's actually DONE with herself - so what I thought was suppose to be a defense still threw her under the bus.
LOL - what the hell? Even Greta Susterin had nothing positive to say. so much for having support form fellow Republican women, eh? All they did was say 'oh, but she's been sick' as if that's ALL she's done in her whole life - which I felt was actually a bit offensive and they might have well as called her a recluse and a cripple. Stupid women
Last edited by Aunt Spiker; 04-13-12 at 08:21 AM.
A screaming comes across the sky.
It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith