- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 101,826
- Reaction score
- 45,419
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Obama Releases $1.5 Billion to Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt
Because your Snapple method doesn't allow corrupt people in the Brotherhood to line their pockets.
From the article:
Okay, can somebody explain this to me?? We're giving them money to buy stuff from us. Wouldn't that be like Snapple giving me $5 to go buy a Snapple? Wouldn't it just be easy for Snapple to hand me a drink off the assembly line instead of handing me the money, which I then hand back to another party in exchange for the item I'm being mandated to buy? Would it not be more efficient for the government to pay their defense contractor directly and have the items themselves sent over to Egypt, if we're going to be mandating the specific items they're allowed to purchase with the money?
Because your Snapple method doesn't allow corrupt people in the Brotherhood to line their pockets.