- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 10,033
- Reaction score
- 3,905
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Of COURSE you wouldn't mention the banks of 2008. What God Fearing Republican doesn't want to forget the Fall of 2008?fixed that for you
Of COURSE you wouldn't mention the banks of 2008. What God Fearing Republican doesn't want to forget the Fall of 2008?fixed that for you
how very interesting.
perhaps the rejection of the Individual Mandate, oddly, will be what it takes to turn Liberals against the dangerous doctrine of Judicial Supremacy?
Of COURSE you wouldn't mention the banks of 2008. What God Fearing Republican doesn't want to forget the Fall of 2008?
In Reply to AdamT,
Congress DOES have the ability to force people to buy things, the real question is will the 5 conservative Supreme Court justices vote responsibly in favor the constitution, or return the favor to the GOP who gave them their seats? Im beginning to worry it's all about returning the favor. While I do believe it will be upheld 6-3 or 5-4 (the most likely outcome), its just plain ludicrous to think a vote could get this close when the bill is obviously constitutional. 5 Tyrants will decide the fate of the millions who need healthcare, while republicans call Obama the dictator.
where did congress get that proper power? and what training do you have to make pronouncements that it is OBVIOUSLY Constitutional when judges and legal scholars have split on this issue.
Is that the way the deal was fed to you? Last I looked we were given bank stocks just like we were given car company stocks - no difference at all.Loaning money to a Bank that has to pay it back =/= buying a company and giving it to it's union.
I had my problems with both, but one is significantly more egregious than the other.
In Reply to AdamT,
Congress DOES have the ability to force people to buy things, the real question is will the 5 conservative Supreme Court justices vote responsibly in favor the constitution, or return the favor to the GOP who gave them their seats? Im beginning to worry it's all about returning the favor. While I do believe it will be upheld 6-3 or 5-4 (the most likely outcome), its just plain ludicrous to think a vote could get this close when the bill is obviously constitutional. 5 Tyrants will decide the fate of the millions who need healthcare, while republicans call Obama the dictator.
Sadly I think you believe what you have typed above. One thing is clear, that 'Moderate' by your name is way off base.
Rachel Maddow told him. No need to think when you can just get your opinion piped in.
In Reply to AdamT,
Congress DOES have the ability to force people to buy things, the real question is will the 5 conservative Supreme Court justices vote responsibly in favor the constitution, or return the favor to the GOP who gave them their seats? Im beginning to worry it's all about returning the favor. While I do believe it will be upheld 6-3 or 5-4 (the most likely outcome), its just plain ludicrous to think a vote could get this close when the bill is obviously constitutional. 5 Tyrants will decide the fate of the millions who need healthcare, while republicans call Obama the dictator.
where did congress get that proper power? and what training do you have to make pronouncements that it is OBVIOUSLY Constitutional when judges and legal scholars have split on this issue.
citation needed....
Is that the way the deal was fed to you? Last I looked we were given bank stocks just like we were given car company stocks - no difference at all.
And not that it's really our business what the companies did with the money but instead of the bank money going to unions it went to a bunch of Fat Cat CEO's who had driven the banks into the hole in the first place.
The Commerce Clause is an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." - Wikipedia
"The Commerce Clause is an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."
I didn't knows judges and legal scholars are genetically engineered to knows the secrets of life. You do understand that these individuals are human beings correct....? And make decisions based on feelings....correct? Only a completely delusional individual could believe that since the supreme court is split on an issue its 100% guaranteed unconstitutional.....you are like a third grader doing a history report.
.... and you believe the commerce clause empowers congress to mandate individual citizens commodity purchases?.. despite never having this power ever before in our entire history?
alllllllrighty then.
"The Commerce Clause is an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."
Also, considering you probably dont know the definition of regulate is, I will be kind enough to give you an exact definition.
reg·u·late/ˈregyəˌlāt/
Verb:
Control or maintain the rate or speed of (a machine or process) so that it operates properly.
any more questions my fellow chess board pawns?
Control or supervise (something, esp. a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.
Synonyms:
adjust - control - arrange - settle - order - regularize
I didn't knows judges and legal scholars are genetically engineered to knows the secrets of life. You do understand that these individuals are human beings correct....? And make decisions based on feelings....correct? Only a completely delusional individual could believe that since the supreme court is split on an issue its 100% guaranteed unconstitutional.....you are like a third grader doing a history report.
I don't see how anyone can read the Commerce Clause and interpret it as "The government can force you to purchase anything it wants you to".
Also, considering you probably dont know the definition of regulate is, I will be kind enough to give you an exact definition.
reg·u·late/ˈregyəˌlāt/
Verb:
Control or maintain the rate or speed of (a machine or process) so that it operates properly.
Control or supervise (something, esp. a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.
Synonyms:
adjust - control - arrange - settle - order - regularize
anymore questions my fellow chess board pawns?
where are individuals mentioned in there.