Do you think some smarmy remark makes you an independent thinker?
Well we will see how much of an independent thinker you are.
As it stands, reciting false information of this case and of the misinformed opinion of what appears to be the majority, does not reflect well on someone who hopes to be an independent thinker.
He identified who was who, and who was calling for help.
Before you go any further, do you understand that? He was actually there.
It was Zimmerman calling for help, and it was Trayvon on top of him.
And this person's statements are corroborated by Zimmerman's statement.
That is two people who were actually at the scene saying the same thing.
Now get ready to use that independent thinker that is in your cranium.
Are you ready?
Now who's statements are most believable?
The man that was on the scene who's statement Zimmerman corroborates, or this woman who was wasn't on the scene but viewed from a longer distance and through a window for a very short period of time?
Yeah, we know.
The statement from the man on the scene is more believable and is corroborated by Zimmerman's own statement.
The woman's statement is obviously a mis-identification.