Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 97

Thread: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

  1. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The greatest city on Earth
    Last Seen
    08-04-12 @ 04:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    31,089

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Fubar View Post
    Denial again.nice tactic.
    what's there to deny?

    not much.

  2. #72
    Student Fubar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    greenville sc
    Last Seen
    07-03-13 @ 10:57 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    201

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder View Post
    what's there to deny?

    not much.
    Presented evidence.not much is not refutation.evidence is evidence until refutation of facts presented as evidence takes place.in this case posting members presented certain parts of the eo as evidence,concluding that ,as it is written,it can be used for a different purpose.you are denying the existence of such purpose,purely on...faith disregarding the argument .
    Listen to your conscience....and let it sink in.

  3. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The greatest city on Earth
    Last Seen
    08-04-12 @ 04:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    31,089

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Fubar View Post
    Presented evidence....
    no evidence whatsoever has been presented that this new EO will allow POTUS to declare martial law and seize everyone's food.

  4. #74
    Sage
    MoSurveyor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Seen
    04-13-17 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,985

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by RabidAlpaca View Post
    I think it's worded far too vague to only grant power in the direst of circumstances.
    I think "direst of circumstances" is far too vague. Decide how big you want the plan to be and I'm sure they can fill it up with scenarios and options - and still be short on possibilities and details.

    You can't predict what may or may not be required to defend the country because it all depends on the specific circumstances. What's required to defend against a biological attack on the B-2 base at Whitman AFB isn't going to be the same things needed to defend against a nuclear attack on NYC, and that won't be the same as what's needed if all the critical electrical power junctions across the country are taken out. All you can do is try to list all the major things that might be needed to help defend against these attacks and keep the country running so it's not vulnerable to further attacks.
    Mt. Rushmore: Three surveyors and some other guy.
    Life goes on within you and without you. -Harrison
    Hear the echoes of the centuries, Power isn't all that money buys. -Peart
    After you learn quantum mechanics you're never really the same again. -Weinberg

  5. #75
    Student Fubar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    greenville sc
    Last Seen
    07-03-13 @ 10:57 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    201

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    [QUOTE=Thunder;1060316341]no evidence whatsoever has been presented that this new EO will allow POTUS to decla
    Ironic...Barry's favorite tactic...denial.no wonder he never pursued law but chose public service instead.use this tactic couple of times and u in contempt of court in a heartbeat....again u are taking stated purpose of eo on faith,denying without refuting the posibillity of a different purpose.you refute by demonstrating.
    Listen to your conscience....and let it sink in.

  6. #76
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The greatest city on Earth
    Last Seen
    08-04-12 @ 04:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    31,089

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Fubar View Post
    ....Ironic...Barry's favorite tactic...denial.no wonder he never pursued law but chose public service instead.use this tactic couple of times and u in contempt of court in a heartbeat....again u are taking stated purpose of eo on faith,denying without refuting the posibillity of a different purpose.you refute by demonstrating.
    still no evidence that this new EO will allow martial law and nationalization of peoples' pantries.

    like I said, there is nothing to refute OR deny.....except for baseless speculation and paranoia.

  7. #77
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder View Post
    still no evidence that this new EO will allow martial law and nationalization of peoples' pantries.

    like I said, there is nothing to refute OR deny.....except for baseless speculation and paranoia.
    Anything other than nuh-uh to add? Lastly, it's not baseless as I already showed - it's all in the interpretation and perspective.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  8. #78
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The greatest city on Earth
    Last Seen
    08-04-12 @ 04:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    31,089

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Anything other than nuh-uh to add? Lastly, it's not baseless as I already showed - it's all in the interpretation and perspective.
    a highly biased and agenda-driven interpretation & perspective, you mean.

  9. #79
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder View Post
    a highly biased and agenda-driven interpretation & perspective, you mean.
    As highly biased and agenda-driven of an interpretation and perspective as saying there's nothing there.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  10. #80
    Student Fubar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    greenville sc
    Last Seen
    07-03-13 @ 10:57 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    201

    Re: Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Anything other than nuh-uh to add? Lastly, it's not baseless as I already showed - it's all in the interpretation and perspective.
    It is evident to those with their eyes open. The. Eo also addresses ''work without compensation''and.......draft.
    Listen to your conscience....and let it sink in.

Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •