- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,075
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Some employers provide health insurance to their employees. A portion of them provide a policy that doesn't cover BC. This mandate prohibits that. Some employers are morally opposed to paying for BC. If they also want to provide health insurance to their employees, they can't do both, so they're forced to choose. Those are the facts. If I'm wrong, prove it.
IMHO, employers shouldn't be forced to make this choice without a good reason. I haven't seen a reason that satisfies me. Those are opinions, so I can't prove that they're right, but you can't prove that they're wrong.
the first choice is getting into public business, theres your proof DONE LOL
secondly what the mandate ACTUALLY does is allow the insurance company to provide it in cases where the employee doesnt have to
also your opinion of satisfaction is meaningless against facts, discrimination is a good reason and proves you are wrong if you think religion is solely a good enough reason to not cover BC.
Last edited: