- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 5,134
- Reaction score
- 6,123
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I hesitate to call him a terrorist. Terrorists have a political purpose... the act of killing or horrific things are meant to promote something political as well as to promote shock and fear. Killing is just a means to an end to accomplish that goal. This guy - I don't see anything that shows he killed these people for a political reason. He's a murderer... maybe psychotic murderer. But I don't see how the label of "terrorist" can be levied at this time.
I agree, the soldier is not a terrorist. That is sensationalized and nonsensical babbling for those that wish to look under their beds for the Bogeyman.