I can see why MK likes the SPLC as a source. The SPLC supports illegal aliens.
The OP story is much to do about nothing.
"I can explain it to you but, I can't understand it for you"
Such a non-story. What IS telling is that POS Janet Napolitano deeming anyone who wants to return to constitutional principles, owns a gun, or returns from military theater should be on a terrorist watch list. The concept that people who think the federal has gone too far are "extremists likely to do harm" is an obvious fallacy on it's face and the fear of people who are more than happy to use their positions of authority to bully humans into compliance of those who fight back is telling of their cowardice and agendas.
Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.
Someone needs to explain to me how MKULTRABOY isnt trolling and baiting in this entire thread?
Originally Posted by MKULTRABOY
U.S. News - Election, economy spark explosive growth of militias
Thoughts on this? I hope they get whacked by artillery.Originally Posted by MKULTRABOY
Apocalyptic hypernationalist patriot cults are innocent victims of the government now!Boys will be apocalyptic anti-Obama neonazi Christians I seeI hop they get hit by the spetnaz and killed in a surgical firefight like ignorant separatists.
I hope you learn how to post and say something thoughtful.
I have no problem with Militias forming as long as they are not breaking any laws.
What I suspect is happening, is that the SPLC (not surprisingly) is lumping regular citizen militias in with "hate groups" and trying to paint the picture that they are one and the same. Shame on them for intellectual dishonesty and attempting to use fear to get Obama re-elected.
Last edited by lizzie; 03-08-12 at 03:16 PM. Reason: typo
"God is the name by which I designate all things which cross my path violently and recklessly, all things which alter my plans and intentions, and change the course of my life, for better or for worse."
-C G Jung
WTF is a "regular citizen militia"?
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. ... It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
-- Adam Smith