Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

  1. #31
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,597
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    I'm entitled to be paid by the taxpayer for my abstinence. Rates are to be based on how often the typical guy in my demographic has sex, times the national avarage a prostitute charges for the 'service'.
    Actually, you're entitled to be paid by your insurance company if you choose a vacsectomy, and the procedure is covered. Nobody gets paid for abstinence, even me. But if you'd like to pay me not to have sex, I can give you my PayPal account.

  2. #32
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    Let's do the math:




    I'm legally married, not living with anyone, so that's twice pr/wk = 8 times pr/mo.

    Just as I assumed the most expensive BC pills and most expensive OBGYN visits, I will also assume the higher typical prostitute charges of $600.

    $600x8 means I'm entitled to $4,800pr/mo or Ms. Fluke is a sexist.
    Prostitution isn't legal unless you're Mr Long Schlong and work in the porn industry. I highly doubt you'd qualify for that position, though - so your argument is null.
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  3. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    Prostitution isn't legal unless you're Mr Long Schlong and work in the porn industry. I highly doubt you'd qualify for that position, though - so your argument is null.
    Oh, so now you're trying to deny me BC

  4. #34
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,597
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    Oh, so now you're trying to deny me BC
    Not at all. If you need male hormonal treatment for low testosterone or erectile dysfunction... not that there's anything wrong with that, dear... I believe your prescription insurance should cover both! Happy?

  5. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    Not at all. If you need male hormonal treatment for low testosterone or erectile dysfunction... not that there's anything wrong with that, dear... I believe your prescription insurance should cover both! Happy?
    Post 27 you equated abstinence as a "reproductive choice" along with other options which people should be paid for.

    I want my Obama Money! From his stash!

    Last edited by Jerry; 03-09-12 at 11:12 PM.

  6. #36
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,597
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    Post 27 you equated abstinence as a "reproductive choice" along with other options which people should be paid for.

    I want my Obama Money! From his stash!

    Actually, Post #27 was directed to another poster who decried the fact that men have no choice over their reproductive rights. I said nothing about money, taxpayer or otherwise. That's your schtick... but it has nothing to do with my Post #27, or the topic of this thread actually.

    Have a nice evening doing what you do. Bye.

  7. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    Actually, Post #27 was directed to another poster who decried the fact that men have no choice over their reproductive rights. I said nothing about money, taxpayer or otherwise. That's your schtick... but it has nothing to do with my Post #27, or the topic of this thread actually.

    Have a nice evening doing what you do. Bye.
    I'm so glad I'm not gona have to worry about mah mortgage, or payin fo gas o anyfin' naw dat we gotz us a Blaq man in awfice!

  8. #38
    Global Moderator
    I'm a Jedi Master, Yo

    CaptainCourtesy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    152,647

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    I'm so glad I'm not gona have to worry about mah mortgage, or payin fo gas o anyfin' naw dat we gotz us a Blaq man in awfice!
    Moderator's Warning:
    MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save livesKnock off the trolling, Jerry, or you are gone from the thread. At least.
    "Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run

    ====||:-D

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiseone View Post
    This is what I hate about politics the most, it turns people in snobbish egotistical self righteous dicks who allow their political beliefs, partisan attitudes, and 'us vs. them' mentality, to force them to deny reality.

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    You can't paint everone with the same brush.......It does not work tht way.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wessexman View Post
    See with you around Captain we don't even have to make arguments, as you already know everything .
    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalThought View Post
    Had you been born elsewhere or at a different time you may very well have chosen a different belief system.
    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    It a person has faith they dont need to convince another of it, and when a non believer is not interested in listening to the word of the lord, " you shake the dust from your sandels and move on"

  9. #39
    Stigmatized! End R Word! Kali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Seen
    08-19-12 @ 12:29 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    13,334
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Kind of offtopic but I read how they are pulling Doonesbury comicstrip from some newspapers over the abortion issue. Dumb as hell and the comic is 100% Wonderful!
    Newsapers pull not-so-funny 'Doonesbury' strip on abortion - msnNOW

    Some newspapers won't be running next week's "Doonesbury" strips | JIMROMENESKO.COM
    ~Following My Own Flow~

  10. #40
    Conservative Independent
    DarkWizard12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Tyler TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    7,562

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    Hmm. I said, "They figured if the state can control women's bodies and reproductive choices, they should control men's bodies and reproductive choices as well."

    Are you implying that men have no reproductive choices? Would you not consider condoms, abstinence, vasectomies to be choices men should be allowed to make about their own bodies? Or are you trying to say that men are so controlled by sexual urges that they have no choice at all, they are forced to have sex or they will die?
    If a guy wants a kid, but the mother is too much of a raging liberal bitch to allow that to happen in any shape or form, including post-birth abortion if she must, then does his choice factor in in any way? not according to law out there I know of. some "reproductive" choice. A guy has a choice to have safe sex or not(provided the girl allows it), and from there, it's all the girl's "choice". riiiight.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •