Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    You need to can your sexist views and try to see things with a more open mind as to cause and effect. . . demonize women's need for birth control and our country reverst to more primitive times and gets flushed - with far reaching affects that will exceed your imagination in ways you likely couldn't imagine - and all would be negative.
    No one's trying to ban BC except for these idiots.

  2. #22
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    No one's trying to ban BC except for these idiots.
    Well aware

    You did, however, purport that women don't belong in politics - that it's a male-only club.

    My response still stands on calling you out on such sexist stupidity. In the hands of males our country has been WORSE off - not better . . . no matter what you want to think. Throughout our history females, blacks, all minorities other than white males have been nothing but taken advantage of, denied 'god given' rights (that conservative pro-lifers claim everyone has) and have been treated as 2nd class citizens through the 'genius' and wide consensus of males in this country.

    You should really be ashamed of this past: most men are and make efforts to not permit us to fall back into the ways of the old.

    You, and others like you however - support the very values and ideas that would degenerate us if you could have all of your views impinged on US citizens as a whole.

    I think it's ridiculous that you want to govern what I can do with my body - but the moment some women make an effort to try to suggest that they should be able to do the same to yours you say 'they don't even belong in politics!'

    Hypocrisy is ripe.
    Last edited by Aunt Spiker; 03-09-12 at 11:56 AM.
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  3. #23
    Guru
    Samhain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Northern Ohio
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:27 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    3,883

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Absolutely, vasectomies shouldn't be covered by insurance.

    They should also restrict all forms of plastic surgery for life saving reasons too.

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    Well aware

    You did, however, purport that women don't belong in politics - that it's a male-only club.

    My response still stands on calling you out on such sexist stupidity. In the hands of males our country has been WORSE off - not better . . . no matter what you want to think. Throughout our history females, blacks, all minorities other than white males have been nothing but taken advantage of, denied 'god given' rights (that conservative pro-lifers claim everyone has) and have been treated as 2nd class citizens through the 'genius' and wide consensus of males in this country.

    You should really be ashamed of this past: most men are and make efforts to not permit us to fall back into the ways of the old.

    You, and others like you however - support the very values and ideas that would degenerate us if you could have all of your views impinged on US citizens as a whole.

    I think it's ridiculous that you want to govern what I can do with my body - but the moment some women make an effort to try to suggest that they should be able to do the same to yours you say 'they don't even belong in politics!'

    Hypocrisy is ripe.
    I'm not the one trying to pass idiotic laws, so whatever.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Samhain View Post
    Absolutely, vasectomies shouldn't be covered by insurance.

    They should also restrict all forms of plastic surgery for life saving reasons too.
    When I get home I plan to have a vasectomy, and I fully expect to pay for the entire thing in cash. I'm not asking women to pay for anything I wouldn't pay for myself.
    Last edited by Jerry; 03-09-12 at 12:13 PM.

  6. #26
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    I'm not the one trying to pass idiotic laws, so whatever.
    Ah! And that's the Valley-girl card.

    Lieeek - Whatevv

    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  7. #27
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,597
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkWizard12 View Post
    yea, good luck with that, as if men ever had a choice.
    Hmm. I said, "They figured if the state can control women's bodies and reproductive choices, they should control men's bodies and reproductive choices as well."

    Are you implying that men have no reproductive choices? Would you not consider condoms, abstinence, vasectomies to be choices men should be allowed to make about their own bodies? Or are you trying to say that men are so controlled by sexual urges that they have no choice at all, they are forced to have sex or they will die?

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    Hmm. I said, "They figured if the state can control women's bodies and reproductive choices, they should control men's bodies and reproductive choices as well."

    Are you implying that men have no reproductive choices? Would you not consider condoms, abstinence, vasectomies to be choices men should be allowed to make about their own bodies? Or are you trying to say that men are so controlled by sexual urges that they have no choice at all, they are forced to have sex or they will die?
    I'm entitled to be paid by the taxpayer for my abstinence. Rates are to be based on how often the typical guy in my demographic has sex, times the national avarage a prostitute charges for the 'service'.

  9. #29
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    I'm entitled to be paid by the taxpayer for my abstinence. Rates are to be based on how often the typical guy in my demographic has sex, times the national avarage a prostitute charges for the 'service'.
    LOL @ the image of you going to a whore
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: MO House bill would restrict vasectomies only to save lives

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    LOL @ the image of you going to a whore
    Let's do the math:
    The average guy has
    sex
    about twice a week if he's married—a little less often (once) if he's single, a little more (three times) if he's single but shacking up.
    Get the Sex You Deserve: Men's Health
    Absolute minimum is usually $150. That means that is the lowest price the lady is allowed to take for anything. Most of them won't do anything for that though, and if they do you'll be lucky to get 5 minutes of their "time".
    Expect to pay from 300 to 600 for a roll in the hay. Some of these girls get up to 1500 for an hour of their time.

    In Nevada, how much do prostitutes charge at brothels? - Yahoo! Answers
    I'm legally married, not living with anyone, so that's twice pr/wk = 8 times pr/mo.

    Just as I assumed the most expensive BC pills and most expensive OBGYN visits, I will also assume the higher typical prostitute charges of $600.

    $600x8 means I'm entitled to $4,800pr/mo or Ms. Fluke is a sexist.
    Last edited by Jerry; 03-09-12 at 10:47 PM.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •