I of course am not arguing that frequency changes things, I've argued that both chants were offensive and I do believe that some on both sides of the court meant to be offensive. I mean the whole "Alamo Whites" chant started after the Mules (Alamo Heights team name) came from behind to win the game in the last quarter. I suspect had Edison not lost the game the "Alamo Whites" chant likely would not have been heard at all. But that is just speculation on my part.
Meanwhile as the thread progresses and the actual topic is being discussed, we have you still pretending I attacked you personally with ad hominem insults. Given the fact that no such attack took place and does not appear anywhere in the thread, all this personal responsibility idiocy of yours is rather irrational. You appear to be letting your irrational emotions get the best of you and make an ass of yourself. Which is fine by me. Either way, we won't be seeing you post the supposed quote in question, ya know because it is a figment of your imagination or a delusion of some sort. Perhaps it is only that you have made a mistake, either way I could care less, end of the day is that you are just talking out your ass about something that never occurred.
If I thought putting it in bold red two story tall neon font would help the poor man come to the realization that he is literally harping on a non existent event, I probably would. But yes, it is a lot of "drama" based around a non event.
Sure.
And frequency still does not prove lack of racial/ethnic intent in this case.
I never said it wasn't insulting in other games. But we're talking about this game and in this game, so: the nationality of the team + the opposing team apparently chanting 'Alamo Whites' + the fact that BOTH Edison and Alamo Heights students said it was meant to be insulting makes the idea that it was insulting and ethnically-based much more likely than the idea that it wasn't insulting or ethnically-based.
Now your claim/stance/story has morphed. Now it is that "I started IT" not used ad hom personal insults to attack you, but started "IT". If you wanted to complain that I was being a smart ass, you should just whine about that. On a message board though, that would just be stupid. Like tripling down with not only a lot of stupid, but a lot of dishonest "hackish" stupid.
Amazingly the only thing you appear capable of in this thread, is contradicting yourself at every turn and doing nothing but complaining about posters and their as you see them flaws and "hackish" comments. The addition of the outright lies and then sudden change of focus from supposed ad hom personal attacks, to who started "IT"? Followed by nothing but what can only be construed as a personal attack that is about me and what was it? My posting style? Not the topic, not the discussion at hand but your personal problems with me?
I apologize for not bothering to read your last post, but the whole take no responsibility meme is already debunked. Not that you would have noticed, as that had something to do with the topic of the thread. Then there is the whole series of post between us where I acknowledged getting some things you said wrong. I even crowned you as I promised I would. Then there is the problem with the fact that tonight I posted *new* admittedly anecdotal information about facts that I had gotten wrong. Don't let the fact that I did all of this in plain sight on a public message board get in the way of your hackish meme though. So at the end of the day, I thank you for withdrawing your claim that I had been personally attacking you ad hom and changing your claim to who started "it". Might even call it something cute, like the Little Rascals Debate. Who started "IT"! You did, no you did. Wait, why are you changing your claim/stance/story? Uhm, never mind?
As you can see by the Captain's recent reluctant posting of the so called examples of me personally attacking him ad hominem, the charge got somewhat watered down once he did a little back tracking and reading. Then it got just feeble when he posted his "proof". Now here you are asking him to quote where you did as he says you did? This should be amusing. Speaking of context, whenever I see a poster on an internet message board trying to psychoanalyze other posters? Sharing with others their keen insights like, you don't accept responsibility for your actions? Based upon an argument or dust up about a political topic on an internet message board? I know we are dealing with a nincompoop that has lost touch with context completely. Which is why I guess these types are always the ones crowing about context. Yip that is the internet for you.
It's like some internet nincompoop keeps playing the same broken scratched up record over and over again, telling everyone it is Pavarotti. Only it sounds like Yankovic.
