- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
They were tolerant... they were going to allow him to live if he confirmed muhhammad existed. He couldve just lied, they wouldve tolerated that... he had to just sing a line or two from the quran most likely and he wouldve been fine and his kids wouldve had a father still..
You call that tollerance? What kind of world do you live in? Stop defending them. They hang people up like they were Christmas ornaments, and for what? Religous domination? Political control? You think that is ok? Do you tell rape victims it is their fault for dressing provactively too? Your logic is about as sound as...well Akmadinajads (it isn't sound).
He deprived his children of their father and for that he is selfish.
Just like it is the rape victim's fault that she lost her virginity to the rapist.
]If I was caught by North Korea and forced to admit a known historical reality to them,
It ISN'T a known historical reality. Muhammad is NOT a prophet of God. That MUST be taken on faith. To not allow someone to have their own faith is barbaric. To justify it by saying, well you could just lie, is ALSO barbaric.
I'd probably say 'oh **** yeah, sure I read wikipedia'
and I'd remain alive, even if I decided to lie.
And then just like Iran they would air the video, and then find some other reason to murder you.
50 years ago some folks couldnt whistle at a white woman without being executed by a mob.
By YOUR logic they shouldn't have whistled. But don't worry. I know it is wrong. So stop playing the left wing "Tollerate everything but Christianity or white people" card, because we all know that it was barbaric to string people up for that too.