Thread: Texas law requires women to hear description of fetus before abortion

Originally Posted by taxigirl

The funds that go to Planned Parenthood and other women's health care providers does not fund abortions. The funds are allocated for things such as breast cancer and cervical cancer screenings, STD tests and education and a whole variety of things that have nothing to do with abortion. These organizations do much much more and abortion is only a very small part of what they do, the government funds do NOT fund abortions.

BULL ****! PROVE IT.


j-mac

Originally Posted by muciti

Apparently some people think it's ok to murder a person as long as you don't actually meet them. It's their right to think that. However, what about the father's rights? Two people having consented with creating a life and some selfish murderous b**** can decide that some poor guys children are worthless and can just abort them because she wants to and there is nothing he can say or do about it. That's pretty messed up.

Oh, the woe! All those murderous bitches abusing all those poor guys. You know what, I can't tell anything about the kind of person you are from the above statement...

Originally Posted by ARealConservative

it is a bit different, but it isn't substantially different. In both situations, a person is being forced to provide for a person that can't survive on their own.

the only difference is some people are ok forcing this on a faceless "society", but not on a named individual.

Nobody is ever forced to care for a child. We, as a society, have chosen to give money to agencies that provide for children. Which is drastically different from donating our bodies to the cause.

Originally Posted by j-mac

BULL ****! PROVE IT.


j-mac

You can find their annual report online. With a little more diligence you can find their financial filings as a 501c3 org. These will outline for you where the restricted funds were spent. The docunents you find should have been audited by an independent auditor.

Originally Posted by kerussll

Nobody is ever forced to care for a child. We, as a society, have chosen to give money to agencies that provide for children. Which is drastically different from donating our bodies to the cause.

"we as a society" are still forcing people to contribute against there will. you can try to cover it in all the rose petals imaginable, it is still force.

The proponents of this legislation should be required to eat their steak only at a meat rendering facility. In fact, they ought to be required to experience every feigned or real negative consequence of every law of which they approve in a manner which the creative energies of any opposition can conjure.

Originally Posted by kerussll

Nobody is ever forced to care for a child. We, as a society, have chosen to give money to agencies that provide for children. Which is drastically different from donating our bodies to the cause.

You, and your man donate your bodies, time, energy, expense, and commitment as soon as your both get horizontal and create the beast with two backs. Or at least some should consider that before engaging.


j-mac

Originally Posted by Tomfoolery

The proponents of this legislation should be required to eat their steak only at a meat rendering facility. In fact, they ought to be required to experience every feigned or real negative consequence of every law of which they approve in a manner which the creative energies of any opposition can conjure.

Funny how abortion is strikingly similar to the picture you try to paint here.


j-mac