• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chris Christie set to veto gay marriage bill

sorry my left wing friend to most people seeing 2 men kiss is disgusting....Men and women are the norm.


What's wrong with two people showing that they love one another?
 
Calling Christie a bigot isn't name calling.

"bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance"

If the label fits....

Bigot is a slur and and insult no one wants to be called one......get real
 
Last edited:
What's wrong with two people showing that they love one another?

What people do in the privacy of their own homes is their business. Some people don't like men & women showing affection in public, I would guess more do not like seeing men & men either... however I have to say I'm a hypocrite when it comes to women & women. That just never seems to get old with me.
 
sorry my left wing friend to most people seeing 2 men kiss is disgusting.


Are you talking about with tongues gently probing one another's expectant mouths, the ravenous admixing of saliva with saliva, increasingly feverous until each is lost in a paroxysm of pure, insatiable homosexual lust demanding immediate release, or just a normal kiss?
 
What's wrong with two people showing that they love one another?

Because to most people its perverse and disgusting to see. Its not what God created men to do and those doing in the eye of most churches are committing a mortal sin and will burn in hell.
 
no. one should govern for his what his constituents want.

Zyphlin is actually correct about this. He has no obligation to act based on popularity, and acting according to his stance on an issue is appropriate. When his election rolls around, people can decide whether they want to vote again for him based on his record.
 
Because to most people its perverse and disgusting to see. Its not what God created men to do and those doing in the eye of most churches are committing a mortal sin and will burn in hell.

So because Church's say no, we shouldn't do it.
 
I think anyone that loves their children would feel the same way if they love their children. Since I don't believe for a minute that gays are born that way you as a parent have to make sure you don't raise your children in and environment where that might happen.

Well, I also don't have a problem with homosexuals, so I'm not worried even if my son does end up being one.
 
It's not really the same vein at all. I'm talking about my love for my son. I know myself enough to make the statement that I will love him no matter what. I am only attempting to speak for myself, which I can do. I asked Navy how he would react if hypothetically one of his relatives came out of the closet and he refuses to believe that is even a possibility. He doesn't seem to understand the concept of hypothetical. Navy claims to be able to speak for other people in his family, which isn't the same.

you have as much control of your feelings as Navy has control of his childrens sexuality.
 
This country is about 90% believers in God so you people do hae a problem

No, the problem I have is when people like you claim others shouldn't have equal rights because their religion says no.
 
Well, I also don't have a problem with homosexuals, so I'm not worried even if my son does end up being one.

Good for you, I think most people would want sttaight children though...Most would like to be a grandpa or grandma some day. I can tell you I love being one.
 
I believe I was talking about gays flaunting their sexuality not men and women of different races married............Have no problem with that never did.

And I was showing you how the two compare. That is what I was talking about in the posts that you have been responding to. I was specifically speaking about how it is very prevalent in the South to not approve of interracial relationships. How, if allowed to do so today, many people in the South would still vote to ban interracial marriages, including your own, just because the people were of two different races and, afterall, it is only attraction and people choose who they are attracted to.

Why would it be okay to allow a restriction to marriage when the attraction is based on sex but wrong to make such a restriction when the attraction is based on race? The fact that a man and a woman can make a baby cannot be the answer since every state allows opposite sex couples that cannot have children together to marry regardless of such an inability.

You are not the ultimate authority on what types of relationships are right and wrong.
 
No, the problem I have is when people like you claim others shouldn't have equal rights because their religion says no.

individuals have rights. we are talking about perks granted to groups of people.
 
you have as much control of your feelings as Navy has control of his childrens sexuality.

I will point out once more that you don't even know me. You don't know what I have control of regarding myself.
 
No, the problem I have is when people like you claim others shouldn't have equal rights because their religion says no.

we have been round and round on that statement for a dozen times so I am not going to get into again. Take the time to read the thread.....thanks
 
Good for you, I think most people would want sttaight children though...Most would like to be a grandpa or grandma some day. I can tell you I love being one.

Ultimately, I just want my son to have a happy life. It's still possible to be a grandma or grandpa with a gay child. Gay couples adopt.
 
I will point out once more that you don't even know me. You don't know what I have control of regarding myself.

you human, right? I know what you are incapable of.
 
Ultimately, I just want my son to have a happy life. It's still possible to be a grandma or grandpa with a gay child. Gay couples adopt.

Gay adoption is a whole another thread my left wing friend.
 
you human, right? I know what you are incapable of.

Good lord, I'm not going to get into this debate with you. I know myself well enough to securely say that I love my child no matter what. Have you ever heard of the concept of "unconditional love"? Now that we've squared that away, perhaps we should get back to the topic. Cool?
 
Gay adoption is a whole another thread my left wing friend.

Oh, I know. I'm just pointing out that it's still possible to be a grandma or grandpa in those situations.
 
we have been round and round on that statement for a dozen times so I am not going to get into again. Take the time to read the thread.....thanks

And throughout this entire thread, you have failed to actually link some ****ing evidence, instead pulling random statements out of your ass and holding them as truth. Until you provide some actual evidence, I will continue to see your posts as nothing more than illogical rants. Until then, I will continue to attempt to pry some actual sense out of you.
 
Back
Top Bottom