• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chris Christie set to veto gay marriage bill

Right, it probably would pass, and Christie knows it probably would pass, and he's supposed to represent the people of his state, but he's going to veto it to cover his exceedingly hard to cover ass in the next Republican primary.



Dude doesn't believe in it just like the president. Instead of campaigning against it or taking a stand against it, he says "let the peoples decide". For this you fault him. :shrug:
 
Because there have been many cases of Gays reverting to Straight I believe its a choice. There are many documented cases of Gays say they have changed, married and have had children and I am not the one to call them a liar.

Actually the "success" rate for gay to straight conversion is extremely low and the way they classify someone as being straight has more to do with someones behavior then their attractions.
 
Dude doesn't believe in it just like the president. Instead of campaigning against it or taking a stand against it, he says "let the peoples decide". For this you fault him. :shrug:

It is a very slick and smooth political move for somebody who wants to climb up the ladder. Let somebody else take the blame. Very crafty.
 
No, people who engage in dangerous sexual behavior are more likely to get, and spread the disease, the sexual orientation, and gender of the person is irrelevant.
Nope. Men who have sex with men are much more likely to get, and spread the disease through "dangerous sexual behavior" than men who only have sex with women.

So you see, sexual orientation is very relevant.
 
Dude doesn't believe in it just like the president. Instead of campaigning against it or taking a stand against it, he says "let the peoples decide". For this you fault him. :shrug:

I fault him for being a bigot. But I guess I can't fault him for acting consistently with his bigoted views.
 
Nothing could be further from the truth. Men who have sex with men are more likely to get the disease from "dangerous" sexual behavior; they are more likely to spread the disease.

Much, much more likely.

Wait, what? You realize how entirely wrong and stupid that is? Anal sex with some one with AIDS will infect a strait person at the exact same rate as some one who is gay. Vaginal sex with some one who has AIDS will infect at the same rate, gay or strait. And so on. The risk factor is the action, not the orientation.
 
Nope. Men who have sex with men are much more likely to get, and spread the disease through "dangerous sexual behavior" than men who only have sex with women.

So you see, sexual orientation is very relevant.

That rather depends on how you define "dangerous sexual behavior".
 
Nope. Men who have sex with men are much more likely to get, and spread the disease through "dangerous sexual behavior" than men who only have sex with women.

So you see, sexual orientation is very relevant.

Nope, your wrong. It's the activity that is important, not gender or orientation.
 
Again, obama did.the same thing. :shrug:

When and how?

And that is your justification for everything some right winger does. Obama did it first.

OOOOOPPPPSSSS!!!! Sorry. Dumb question. Of course it is.
 
Actually its not, I understands his position and like Christie it's rather pragmatic. But when there is actual debate, make sure you do your best to stifle it! :thumbs:

Oh, the irony!
 
Wait, what? You realize how entirely wrong and stupid that is? Anal sex with some one with AIDS will infect a strait person at the exact same rate as some one who is gay. Vaginal sex with some one who has AIDS will infect at the same rate, gay or strait. And so on. The risk factor is the action, not the orientation.
Even if that were true (it isn't) - it doesn't mean that sexual orientation is irrelevant. Orientation determines what type of sex acts you are likely to engage in.
 
Even if that were true (it isn't) - it doesn't mean that sexual orientation is irrelevant. Orientation determines what type of sex acts you are likely to engage in.

Not really.



(hint: not all gay men have anal sex)
 
Actually the "success" rate for gay to straight conversion is extremely low and the way they classify someone as being straight has more to do with someones behavior then their attractions.

If one person changed then any can and that means they are not born that way and can't change.
 
Even if that were true (it isn't)

Actually, it is true.

- it doesn't mean that sexual orientation is irrelevant. Orientation determines what type of sex acts you are likely to engage in.

Wrong again. Orientation merely determines who some one is attracted to.
 
Here we go with the inasulting again. I guess when it comes to the left that will never change when they are losing the debate.

Oh and use your spell checker......thanks

I'm not insulting. I'm stating the truth.

And that's coming from the man who insists on putting ........ in every single post he makes.
 
I'm not insulting. I'm stating the truth.

And that's coming from the man who insists on putting ........ in every single post he makes.

I put ..... in most of my posts. What is your point.
 
Back
Top Bottom