"You know, when they came and took away my fourth amendment I kept my yap shut, what the hell, I really didnít have anything to hide anyway. When they grabbed up my second amendment I sat still and bit my tongue because, truth be told, Iím allergic to guns. But here we are, you with your cold hard fingers wrapped around the neck of my first amendment and Iíve got to shout as loud as I can, because if I donít, before you know it, you wonít let me say nothing at all"
--Randolph J. Dworkin
ďReading makes a full man, meditation a profound man, discourse a clear man.Ē
-- Ben Franklin
"It has been said that something as small as the flutter of a butterfly's wing can ultimately cause a typhoon halfway around the world"
-- Chaos Theory
This affects everyone. So by this logic they should have have millions of witnesses. Men, women, each race, religion, gay, lesbians, tall people, short people ect, and every combination of each.It doesn't have to be percieved to be affecting them negatively. The only issue is that it affects them. As such it makes sense they should be represented by witnesses
A screaming comes across the sky.
It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow
I seriously don't understand why you people can't separate the two, because there is a distinct separation.
This hearing is not about denying birth control to women.
This hearing is not about whether or not women should have "free" access to birth control.
This hearing is not about rights of women.
This hearing is about whether or not the administration overstepped its bounds via separation of church and state.
"Hmmm...Can't decide if I want to watch "Four Houses" or give myself an Icy Hot pee hole enema..." - Blake Shelton
Congratulations, a straw man and an ad hom in one! You have won the fallacy sweepstakes for this thread. Now get out.People don't separate the two because the two aren't seperate. Why are you afraid of letting women have representation in regards to an issue that directly affects them?
If it were 5 women, your reaction would be what? Just checking.
If it were only women I would ask why aren't men being represented.
Taxation with out representation is wrong. Women are taxed and bound by the constitution. This legislation directly effects them so they by any stretch of logic and integrity should have representation.