• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYC Mayor Conducts Gun-Sale Sting in Arizona

So you base your arguments on this The Racist Roots of Gun Control written by a software engineer with a telecommunications manufacturer in Northern California. Where is the meat of your argument?


actually I was the first to cite that and its merely one of many pieces of evidence that demonstrate that racism and bigotry was what motivated gun control laws-be in ones passed by the klan in post reconstruction era southern states or the anti Italian "Sullivan Law" in NYC
 
you want repeat drug dealers, thieves, and rapists...to have the ability to buy a Glock????

No, I want such as those to be kept permanently in prison, or put to death; either of which would render moot any question about their Second Amendment rights.
 
No, I want such as those to be kept permanently in prison, or put to death; either of which would render moot any question about their Second Amendment rights.

you want all thieves to be in prison.....indefinitely?


sorry, but that would violate the 8th Amendment.
 
Sorry, you are making my head spin with all the yelling going on in here.

Thunder, what about the DOJ and their illegal activities when they get their hands on info about law abiding citizens with unpopular beliefs? That is the question you have not answered. That is the question you avoid by diverting the topic to telling people not to read your posts anymore.
 
sometimes its an inadvertent result of their ruling.

if the SCOTUS rules on an issue that did not exist in 1787, its possible that this ruling may be interpreted as...and having the effect of, a new law.

its just the way things are. sorry.


No, it's not.

It's corruption. It's a branch of government claiming a power that does not belong to it.

If an issue did not exist in 1787, and it now needs to be addressed, the Congress needs to pass a law to address it. Lacking such a law, the courts have no basis on which to make such a ruling.

The courts do not have the legitimate authority to create new law, not even as “an inadvertent result of their ruling”.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, you are making my head spin with all the yelling going on in here.

Thunder, what about the DOJ and their illegal activities when they get their hands on info about law abiding citizens with unpopular beliefs?....

gun control. this thread is about gun control.

focus.
 
gun control. this thread is about gun control.

focus.


actually its about the analwart mayor breaking a bunch of laws that he has not been prosecuted for so he can whine that we need more laws
 
gun control. this thread is about gun control.

focus.
No, this thread is about the illegal actions of a statist piece of **** mayor who violated multiple state and federal laws. Focus.
 
if you want to buy a gun in this country, you must go through a background check. that's unless you buy from a gun show or a private seller.

this process would be made EASIER & QUICKER...if your ability to own a firearm, was registered on your drivers license.

my solution, would make things easier & quicker for legal gun buyers.

but some folks are acting like it would make more of a hassle. I wonder why.


What would make it even easier for gun owners and dealers and honest people in general would be for the government to obey the Constitution.
 
What would make it even easier for gun owners and dealers and honest people in general would be for the government to obey the Constitution.

yeah but think of all the bureaucrats who would lose jobs

think of all the dependent teat sucklers who would go hungry

think of all the politicians strung up for treason

it would be a wonderful scene!!
 
however, if the ATF has the right to records of all gun-sales over 5 guns per person, then I see no problem with making those records instant & digital.

what's soo wrong with digitizing these records?

what's soo wrong with putting listing one's legal right to own a firearm, on the barcode of their drivers license?

if anything, these things will make things easier & quicker for legitimate gun buyers, and harder only for thieves & murderers.

What is so wrong with obeying the Constitution?

There's no point to “putting listing one's legal right to own a firearm, on the barcode of their drivers license”, because every free American has that right, period. Even if he doesn't have a drivers license.
 
Last edited:
...There's no point to “putting listing one's legal right to own a firearm, on the barcode of their drivers license”/, because every free American has that right, period, even if he doesn't have a drivers license.


drivers license, state ID, whatever.

and no, Americans who have committed a felony, or have been institutionalized by a judge, don't have that right.
 
_____
67122321d1329029962-thunders-thunderdome-thunder-suck-foolhaiku.gif

_____

what is this? useless gifs?

What do you see in that picture?
 
Back
Top Bottom