• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Komen Reverses Decision On Funding PP

Re: Komen reverses move to cut Planned Parenthood funding

nonpareil said:
Projecting much? Just pointing out the dishonesty, if you don't want to talk about it, then don't reply.


Nor are they using Komen's money for contraceptive at Planned Parenthood, you are the one who is trying to use contraception as an arguement against Planned Parenthood. Why not just come out and say you are against Planned Parenthood, not contraceptive, instead going around the bush.
Click to expand...

right, projecting and dishonesty. you got me, good job.

despite your best efforts to make my position out to be deeply personal and/or irrational, the facts remain that Komen dollars would likely accomplish more toward the eradication of breast cancer if bestowed on an institution that gives research, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer higher priority than does PP, and the decision to re-designate funds is not necessarily a step back for women's health or a sleazy political ploy.
 
Re: Komen reverses move to cut Planned Parenthood funding

emdash said:
right, projecting and dishonesty. you got me, good job.

despite your best efforts to make my position out to be deeply personal and/or irrational, the facts remain that Komen dollars would likely accomplish more toward the eradication of breast cancer if bestowed on an institution that gives research, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer higher priority than does PP, and the decision to re-designate funds is not necessarily a step back for women's health or a sleazy political ploy.
Click to expand...

The fund might be better used by other organisations to fight cancer, but that wasn't the justification given by the Komen Foundation. Judging from circumstantial evidence, the fund was withdrawn for political reasons. Read the previous page for this discussion. There's nothing wrong with an organisation making decisions base on politics, nor do I find to this particular decision to be "sleazy", it was simply stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom