• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US economy creates 243,000 jobs in January

Status
Not open for further replies.
What is the Bush average for 8 years, Sheik?
Bush: 144% increase in discouraged workers -- Conservative applauds
Obama: 44% increase in discouraged workers -- Conservative seeks impeachment



Stop with the bull**** personal attacks
WTF??

What was the personal attack?? Pointing out that it was you, and not Adam, who said those numbers were seasonally adjusted??


:lol::lol::lol:
 
Bush: 144% increase in discouraged workers -- Conservative applauds
Obama: 44% increase in discouraged workers -- Conservative seeks impeachment




WTF??

What was the personal attack?? Pointing out that it was you, and not Adam, who said those numbers were seasonally adjusted??


:lol::lol::lol:
you caught him with his pants down....again....lol
 
I'll give you some math kid!

Bush had 8 years.
Obama has had 3.

Looks like it's going worse with Obama....but if you want 8 to be the same as 3, then the wussification of america will accept it.
In that case, let's not forget that Clinton handed Bush an economy not in recession with 4.2% unemployment while Bush handed Obama one of the worst recessions in U.S. history with 7.8% unemployment.
 
Bush: 144% increase in discouraged workers -- Conservative applauds
Obama: 44% increase in discouraged workers -- Conservative seeks impeachment




WTF??

What was the personal attack?? Pointing out that it was you, and not Adam, who said those numbers were seasonally adjusted??


:lol::lol::lol:

Yes, Bush average per month 408 and Obama average per month 980 which is more than double the Bush average
 
In that case, let's not forget that Clinton handed Bush an economy not in recession with 4.2% unemployment while Bush handed Obama one of the worst recessions in U.S. history with 7.8% unemployment.

Oh yeah, and Bush might have done a little. But the REAL cause were YOUR GUYS Dodd, and Frank! Remember that?
 
In that case, let's not forget that Clinton handed Bush an economy not in recession with 4.2% unemployment while Bush handed Obama one of the worst recessions in U.S. history with 7.8% unemployment.

Exactly, amazing how Bush took office after one of the closest elections in history and generated a recession that began in March 2001 without implementing an economic plan. That is liberal logic
 
Exactly, amazing how Bush took office after one of the closest elections in history and generated a recession that began in March 2001 without implementing an economic plan. That is liberal logic

Most of the Bush years were good in the economy.
 
Oh yeah, and Bush might have done a little. But the REAL cause were YOUR GUYS Dodd, and Frank! Remember that?
Oh yeah, the two members of the minority party who ran the Congress.

:roll::roll::roll:
 
Most of the Bush years were good in the economy.
Just like the Obama years would have been a lot better had he, like Bush, been handed an economy not in recession, with a 4.2% unemployment rate.
 
Ahem, the were in majority after 2006. ;) Of course, you've been wussified, so 1 + 1 = 3. :2wave:
By 2006, the damage was already done. In 2006, there was a record number of foreclosures as the housing bubble already began to crumble. Sycophants blame the minority party.

:roll::roll::roll:
 
Last edited:
By 2006, the damage was already done. In 2006, there was a record number foreclosures as the housing bubble already began to crumble. Sycophants blame the minority party.

:roll::roll::roll:

That has to do with bush's spending, not Dodd-Frank. Again, you were wussified, so what ever you think is right, because if your wrong it would hurt your poor self esteem.
 
Today's headlines from Bloomberg:

headlines.JPG


A very said day in Conservativeville. ;)

A good day for America is a bad day for Conservatives.
 
A good day for America is a bad day for Conservatives.

It will be a great day for America when Barack Obama gets those great Donald Trump Words, "You're Fired!" only a true nanny state supporter and class warfare supporting liberal would vote to re-elect Obama
 
Don't even think you can project your pathological lying onto me, Con.

Foreclosure filings set record in 2006

And of course, in 2006 when Republican policies were coming home to roost, 2010 hadn't occurred yet. So my comment, "In 2006, there was a record number of foreclosures as the housing bubble already began to crumble," is not the lie you wish it was.

And that record set in 2010 ... ? That would be the hangover from the Bush administration.
 
It will be a great day for America when Barack Obama gets those great Donald Trump Words, "You're Fired!" only a true nanny state supporter and class warfare supporting liberal would vote to re-elect Obama
Ummm, in 2017 when Obama leaves the White House, it'll be more like, "ciao."
 
That has to do with bush's spending, not Dodd-Frank. Again, you were wussified, so what ever you think is right, because if your wrong it would hurt your poor self esteem.
Say what???

Bush's spending caused the housing market collapse???

G'head ... connect the dots to that delusion. For entertainment's sake, of course.
 
Don't even think you can project your pathological lying onto me, Con.

Foreclosure filings set record in 2006

And of course, in 2006 when Republican policies were coming home to roost, 2010 hadn't occurred yet. So my comment, "In 2006, there was a record number of foreclosures as the housing bubble already began to crumble," is not the lie you wish it was.

And that record set in 2010 ... ? That would be the hangover from the Bush administration.

This is just another embarassment for you, Sheik, the report is for the STATE OF MASSACHUETTS, not the nation

Foreclosure filings by Massachusetts mortgage lenders last year reached a record level, as 19,487 of the state's homeowners were in financial distress and in danger of losing their home

just goes to show that your arrogance trumps reality in your world
 
This is just another embarassment for you, Sheik, the report is for the STATE OF MASSACHUETTS, not the nation



just goes to show that your arrogance trumps reality in your world
Nah, just goes to show that everyone, myself included, makes mistakes.

The record set nationally in 2006 was a quarterly record, not an annual record ...


Last Quarter of 2006's Foreclosures at Record High

... the point, that the housing bubble began bursting in 2006, remains.
 
This is just another embarassment for you, Sheik, the report is for the STATE OF MASSACHUETTS, not the nation



just goes to show that your arrogance trumps reality in your world

Hey, he was told that if he thinks 2+2 is 5, it's OK. He's been wussified.
 
Nah, just goes to show that everyone, myself included, makes mistakes.

The record set nationally in 2006 was a quarterly record, not an annual record ...


Last Quarter of 2006's Foreclosures at Record High

... the point, that the housing bubble began bursting in 2006, remains.

And the 2010 was a yearly Record, was Bush in office in 2010? Your partisan hackery is an embarrassment. What is it about liberals that prevent you from thinking before posting and having such great loyalty? I always said it takes no guts to be a liberal.
 
Last edited:
And the 2010 was a yearly Record, what Bush in office in 2010? Your partisan hackery is an embarrassment. What is it about liberals that prevent you from thinking before posting and having such great loyalty? I always said it takes no guts to be a liberal.

He's the messiah!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom