The Dow was at 10,600 when Bush became president. It took 7 years for it to increase 34%, rising 3,600 points.
Under Obama, it didn't take 7 years to increase 34%. It was up 34% in 21 months. It's currently up 57%, after rising 4,700 points.
It's your sycophancy which leads you to believe that a 3,600 point gain after 7 years is better than 4,700 point gain in 3.
Not to mention the NASDAQ, which at 2,966 is nearly double what it was when he started and higher than at any point while Bush was president.
And of course, the coup de gras ... even though it took 7 years under Bush to increase 34%, it took 8 years under Bush for it crash to just over 8,000; a 2,300 point loss (22% drop)
And Bush remains in the undistinguished category with Herbert Hoover as the only presidents to leave office with all indexes of the stock market lower than when they started.
You're so proud, ain'tcha?
Yes. They do.
Here's the NIE the president had ...Nice dodge. The entire house and the entire Senate are remarkably untrustworthy people. Let me try this again. "The leadership on the intelligence communities have regular, enduring intelligence briefings. The leadership of both parties are briefed and may ask questions. If you did not know that before you know it now."http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd-nie.pdf
...and here's the NIE that everyone in the Congress had ...
[COLOR=#0000FF]Those two documents not alike, not even "essentially."
It will never be true no matter how many times you repeat it.
The fact is, there were two copies of the NIE (and for a reason, despite your empty denials)
One was 96 pages
One was 28 pages
They were not the same.