• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ranger zaps off-leash dog walker with shock weapon

It seems that now days your average cop is just a money collector. QUOTAS QUOTAS QUOTAS.

I've had cops let me off with just a warning. So maybe im not being fair. But it really does feel like cops are money collectors more than civil protection.
 
Tigger said:
In the "good olde days" there wouldn't have been a public park like that. It would have been private property and letting your dogs loose on my property would likely have lead to me coming out with a gun to ensure that both you and the dogs got off my property and stayed off it, one way or another. It's STILL legal to shoot dogs that bother livestock in most states.
Click to expand...

Let's stop defending the Nazi Park bitch.
 
My first instinct is to not believe the story. I just have a hard time believing someone who doesn't have the intelligence to remain there while the ranger checks their name. I mean it just seems...fishy. Not to mention the range was a woman, and so it makes me wonder if there was anything else stated or done during this or by the idiot who did not comply (because let's face it you are a total moron if you do not comply).

As far as dogs go:

It is legal to shoot a dog in a defensive situation, and certainly if it is causing problems on your land. LEOs also have a right to protect themselves. Remember you are liable for your dog's action.
 
American said:
Let's stop defending the Nazi Park bitch.
Click to expand...

Do we know she is? I didn't catch her statement. I certainly know that I do not want to trust someone who total disregards what a LEO says. I mean sure she is out of line if all that happened is what the idiot said, but if there is more to this story I want to know.
 
Tigger said:
In the "good olde days" there wouldn't have been a public park like that.
Click to expand...

Of course there would. Parks aren't some new invention.
 
American said:
Let's stop defending the Nazi Park bitch.
Click to expand...

Why? So far as I'm concerned she showed great RESTRAINT in not shooting the SOB.

1Perry said:
Of course there would. Parks aren't some new invention.
Click to expand...

Public Parks actually ARE something of a new invention. Especially these large Park Service type of spaces. Even public parks were not terribly common in the colonial days. The town common was generally available for grazing animals but beyond that, there were not the type of public recreation areas we see today until the 20th Century.
 
Tigger said:
Why? So far as I'm concerned she showed great RESTRAINT in not shooting the SOB.



Public Parks actually ARE something of a new invention. Especially these large Park Service type of spaces. Even public parks were not terribly common in the colonial days. The town common was generally available for grazing animals but beyond that, there were not the type of public recreation areas we see today until the 20th Century.
Click to expand...

Wrong again. Parks have been around for centuries. The Boston Common was set aside as a park in the early 1600s. Fredrick Olmstead designed hundreds of parks throughout the U.S. in the 1800s, including one here in Louisville.
 
Gill said:
Wrong again. Parks have been around for centuries. The Boston Common was set aside as a park in the early 1600s. Fredrick Olmstead designed hundreds of parks throughout the U.S. in the 1800s, including one here in Louisville.
Click to expand...

Gill, I lived not 200 feet from the oldest PUBLIC park in the United States (Elm Park in Worcester, MA) for three years. I also know that PUBLIC PARKS were not a COMMON idea until the latter part of the 1800's (largely after the Civil War); by which time the US was no longer in the "Good Olde Days" as I see them.
 
Tigger said:
Why? So far as I'm concerned she showed great RESTRAINT in not shooting the SOB.



Public Parks actually ARE something of a new invention. Especially these large Park Service type of spaces. Even public parks were not terribly common in the colonial days. The town common was generally available for grazing animals but beyond that, there were not the type of public recreation areas we see today until the 20th Century.
Click to expand...

Sure she did, maybe she should have shot him with a gun over a dog leash policy. :roll: I wish that dog had taken a **** on her shoe.
 
American said:
Sure she did, maybe she should have shot him with a gun over a dog leash policy.
Click to expand...

No. Over his unwillingness to comply with the orders of a badged law enforcement officer.
 
Gill said:
Wrong again. Parks have been around for centuries. The Boston Common was set aside as a park in the early 1600s. Fredrick Olmstead designed hundreds of parks throughout the U.S. in the 1800s, including one here in Louisville.
Click to expand...

National Parks on large level was started by TR if I am not mistaken, with Yellowstone.
 
Tigger said:
No. Over his unwillingness to comply with the orders of a badged law enforcement officer.
Click to expand...

She had his name. The dogs ended up leashed. All she had to do was follow him to his car and get the license plate n BOOM ticket confirmed. Instead he ended up on the ground (no longer walking away) saying, "Please dont taze me. I have a bad heart." when she lit him up. (according to an eye witness).

Id say a person groveling on their back and begging verbaly = compliance and she tazed him anyways. Unless the guy was comming at her getting ready to attack and the witness is phony included in some consipiracy.... She tazed him because she was angry and didnt like his attitude. Thats not what tazers are for. I hope this guy becomes a few hundred dollars richer because of this.
 
Gill said:
Here's a couple for you. It's so common I'm not going to bother with any more. Any one with an ounce of research skill could find many more.

Here's one that happened locally a couple months ago:


Read more: Embattled Constable Indicted By Grand Jury - Louisville News Story - WLKY Louisville







Read more: New Orleans police convicted in Danziger Bridge shooting



Read more: Phoenix police officer in fatal shooting arrested
Click to expand...

So with millions of LEO's, you can't even come up with more examples than I could count on one hand

You only proved my point that the prosecution of cops who fire on fleeing suspects is rare

(Note: Your such a fail at this debate that you don't even realize that at least one of those examples have nothing to do with a suspect who is fleeing) :lamo
 
dirtpoorchris said:
Yes.... Cops not being ticket fascists = you promote slavery.... Get the **** outa here.
Click to expand...

Hey, if you're going to be absurd and call her a "fascist" (because I'm sure she runs a concentration camp to kill Jews), I'll compare the absurd remarks to slavery
 
sangha said:
Hey, if you're going to be absurd and call her a "fascist" (because I'm sure she runs a concentration camp to kill Jews), I'll compare the absurd remarks to slavery
Click to expand...

Yes... Cops being nice = slavery. I got your absurd point. Glad you promote cops getting all NAZI with their ticket quotas. If she would have just warned him and let him go after he leashed his dogs then black people would need to be put in chains........ Got it.

PAPERS!!! PAPERS!!! *blows whistle furiously*
 
Last edited:
dirtpoorchris said:
Yes... Cops being nice = slavery. I got your absurd point. Glad you promote cops getting all NAZI with their ticket quotas.

PAPERS!!! PAPERS!!! *blows whistle furiously*
Click to expand...

Yeah right! Because the nazis were known for tazering people :roll:
 
sangha said:
Yeah right! Because the nazis were known for tazering people :roll:
Click to expand...

PAPERS! Or get out of thread. :p

No papers? *BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT* You shoulda listened to my order and got out of this thread.
 
sangha said:
Still here (and so are your ridiculous nazi comparisons)
Click to expand...

Right.. Because comparing authoritarianism actions with a previous authoritarian state = stupid because technology evolves over time and NAZIs didnt have tazers. Gotcha.
 
dirtpoorchris said:
Right.. Because comparing authoritarianism actions with a previous authoritarian state = stupid because technology evolves over time and NAZIs didnt have tazers. Gotcha.
Click to expand...

Right...because tazering people is what the Nazis are known for........:lamo:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom