Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
You rationalized the level of his responsibility. As far as your conclusion regarding my opinion, start at Post #1 in this thread and read all my posts. If you're even partially intellectually honest, you will realize that your conclusion is incorrect.
Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
I'm open to the idea that he's not actually a racist... though I do think it is possible... but the other factors tell me a lot more about how he would govern than he would like us to know, and I believe that would not serve anybody well.
So he might not be a racist, but then again he might be? Did I get it this time?

Rationalizing his responsibility? Where did I do that? Why not read all my posts and tell me where I did any rationalizing. Again, what I said was he was responsible for the newsletters, I just don't believe he is a racist.