1. You have failed to present any argument that a lack of knowledge on Holder's part of the gunwalking = incompetence, especially in a department (DOJ) that employs 112,000 people. While it may be your opinion that such is the case, a lack of argument supporting that opinion would seem to make it an uninformed opinion, which is kinda like an asshole -- widespread, and often smelly.
Lack of proof at this time is not conclusive proof forever. Thats why getting all the information is important. Im entitled to my own opinion and your response is uncalled for.
2. You have failed to present any argument that the DOJ is "stonewalling". That they have not turned over every scrap of paper that Issa has asked for is not evidence of stonewalling. As to the operation, that was clearly some type of sting that clearly was not handled or implemented well -- unless you have evidence of intent to perpetrate a crime, you have no 'dirt'... you have a bungled op.
Its not stonewalling? Then what is it? Looks like refusal to accept congressional oversight. ALL of Holder's emails should be on the congressional oversight desk. But they aren't.
3. This is simply stupid. You might have a point on the top man resigning if we all lived in Japan, and if this happened in Japan. We don't, and it didn't.
The man in question is the guy that took the 5th, not Holder, maybe you were unclear on that. If a member of a federal agency refuses to comply with governmental oversight over their agency, they shouldnt have a job with that agency.
4. Again, you present no argument. Just opinion and insults at those who refuse to swallow the Kool Aid. Seems to be a pattern . . . . .
