I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.
Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.
Point 1, Holder should resign because hes either complicit in knowing exactly what happened in the operation or hes so incompetent that he didnt know what was going on. In either event hes proving to be incompetent at his job and for that he definitely should resign.
Point 2, Dirty in that the DOJ is both complicit in the operations and stonewalling fact finding that it is required by law to comply in. Dirty in that they undertook or instructed an operation in which interdiction of the weapons in question was near impossible and served to proliferate gun smuggling and illegal movement of guns over the US Mexican border and facilitated their use in illgal activity---kidnapping, drug running, illegal border crossings, coyote operations, and smuggling of all sorts. They facilitated this. Thats the opposite of their mission.
Point 3, Partisan or not, the man has a duty to comply or resign from DoJ. The man in question knows how high up the chain this goes and is pleading the 5th to prevent higher ups from taking the heat or he is afraid for prosecution himself. If the latter, Issa will probably offer immunity for truthful testimony. If the former, I predict hes going to cited for contempt of congress. The more people find out about this, the less people like government's role in it; aside from hard leftists like yourself who twist yourself into logical pretzels to excuse the current administration.
Play stupid with your posts somewhere else, you know the facts in question, you are just too partisan to give a damn.
Originally Posted by johnny_rebson:
These are the same liberals who forgot how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.
What do you feel Holder's responsibilty in Fast and Furious is? What remedy or solution to feel applies to him?
2. You have failed to present any argument that the DOJ is "stonewalling". That they have not turned over every scrap of paper that Issa has asked for is not evidence of stonewalling. As to the operation, that was clearly some type of sting that clearly was not handled or implemented well -- unless you have evidence of intent to perpetrate a crime, you have no 'dirt'... you have a bungled op.
3. This is simply stupid. You might have a point on the top man resigning if we all lived in Japan, and if this happened in Japan. We don't, and it didn't.
4. Again, you present no argument. Just opinion and insults at those who refuse to swallow the Kool Aid. Seems to be a pattern . . . . .