Page 71 of 83 FirstFirst ... 2161697071727381 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 710 of 821

Thread: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

  1. #701
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    08-09-13 @ 08:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,600

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post
    So what? What is the problem?
    So.. in future.. Do your own research or continue to invent your beliefs out of thin air.

  2. #702
    Debate MMA
    Prof. Peabody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    07-30-12 @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,361

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by sharon View Post
    So.. in future.. Do your own research or continue to invent your beliefs out of thin air.
    Is it you just don't like oil? Have you given up your car and walk, ride a horse or use public transportation to go everywhere?
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

  3. #703
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    08-09-13 @ 08:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,600

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post
    Is it you just don't like oil? Have you given up your car and walk, ride a horse or use public transportation to go everywhere?
    This is an export pipeline.. It will be refined in a Saudi refinery on a Free Trade zone and sold overseas.

    It won't increase US supply or reduce prices at the pumps.

  4. #704
    Debate MMA
    Prof. Peabody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    07-30-12 @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,361

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by sharon View Post
    This is an export pipeline.. It will be refined in a Saudi refinery on a Free Trade zone and sold overseas.

    It won't increase US supply or reduce prices at the pumps.
    Your not making any sense at all. If the oil sands were simply to be exported, Canada has plenty of ports to do that without send it to the gulf of Mexico first. So your response sounds like bull crap. So, please post a link to back up your assertion.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

  5. #705
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    08-09-13 @ 08:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,600

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post
    Your not making any sense at all. If the oil sands were simply to be exported, Canada has plenty of ports to do that without send it to the gulf of Mexico first. So your response sounds like bull crap. So, please post a link to back up your assertion.
    Canadians don't want this gunk piped across their land to the ports and the Chinese owned Canadian oil companies don't want to pay the higher Canadian taxes and transit fees when they can take advantage of NAFTA by going south.

    Yes.. I do like oil.... I don't like stupid or having decisions shoved down American throats with lies about HUGE new job numbers related to this tax dodge.

  6. #706
    Debate MMA
    Prof. Peabody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    07-30-12 @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,361

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by sharon View Post
    Canadians don't want this gunk piped across their land to the ports and the Chinese owned Canadian oil companies don't want to pay the higher Canadian taxes and transit fees when they can take advantage of NAFTA by going south.

    Yes.. I do like oil.... I don't like stupid or having decisions shoved down American throats with lies about HUGE new job numbers related to this tax dodge.
    Shovel that crapola elsewhere please. I asked a question you seem unwilling to answer.

    "So, please post a link to back up your assertion."

    This is an export pipeline.. It will be refined in a Saudi refinery on a Free Trade zone and sold overseas.
    Do you have a link to back up you "story" or don't you? A simple yes or no will do.



    p.s. I negotiated labor contracts for 12 years, I am a skilled debater in case you haven't noticed. I also accept the white flag of surrender with grace if you choose to do so.
    Last edited by Prof. Peabody; 02-06-12 at 10:44 PM.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

  7. #707
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    08-09-13 @ 08:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,600

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post
    Shovel that crapola elsewhere please. I asked a question you seem unwilling to answer.

    "So, please post a link to back up your assertion."



    Do you have a link to back up you "story" or don't you? A simple yes or no will do.
    Many links have been posted over the past couple of weeks .. most of them repeatedly..

    If you were actually interested, you wouldn't be so far behind the curve.......

    and the information is readily available on google..

    I am not researching any thing else for your lazy self... to be told so what.

  8. #708
    Debate MMA
    Prof. Peabody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    07-30-12 @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,361

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by sharon View Post
    Many links have been posted over the past couple of weeks .. most of them repeatedly..

    If you were actually interested, you wouldn't be so far behind the curve.......

    and the information is readily available on google..

    I am not researching any thing else for your lazy self... to be told so what.
    I will accept your surrender then.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

  9. #709
    Educator Gary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Seen
    12-29-12 @ 12:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,106

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post
    Why don't you back up your assertions with some links to bonified news sources.
    You're making the claim about using Buffett's railroads, so you prove it!

    Where is your link that there are even train tracks going to that tar sand area? To transport something you have to have a continuous means of transportation. No one has built a thousand railroad tank cars, waiting for the day when someone would want to use them.

    Buffetts interest in rails was based on ethanol.

  10. #710
    Debate MMA
    Prof. Peabody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    07-30-12 @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,361

    Re: Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected

    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    You're making the claim about using Buffett's railroads, so you prove it!

    Where is your link that there are even train tracks going to that tar sand area? To transport something you have to have a continuous means of transportation. No one has built a thousand railroad tank cars, waiting for the day when someone would want to use them.

    Buffetts interest in rails was based on ethanol.
    Warren Buffett cleans up after Keystone XL

    The Sage of Omaha is one lucky guy.

    by John Hayward 01/24/2012

    Amusingly, a spokesman for the Sierra Club admitted “there is no question that [transporting] oil by rail or truck is much more dangerous than a pipeline,” but that didn’t stop the zero-growth eco-fanatics from calling in their chips with President Downgrade to kill that pipeline.

    Those rail shipments are expected to “increase exponentially with increased oil production and the shortage of pipelines,” according to Justin Kringstad, director of the North Dakota Pipeline Authority. That’s going to be quite a windfall for the railroad companies, isn’t it?

    As it happens, 75 percent of the oil currently shipped by rail out of North Dakota is handled by Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC… which just happens to be a unit of Warren Buffett’s company, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. What a coincidence!

    Warren Buffet Cleans Up After Keystone XL - HUMAN EVENTS
    I save all my research. Would you like anything else?
    Last edited by Prof. Peabody; 02-06-12 at 11:31 PM.
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

Page 71 of 83 FirstFirst ... 2161697071727381 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •