My point is that the further the definition of marriage slides, the less serious we as a society will take the institution. Marriage, traditionally, is between a breeding pair of man and woman, a union made permanent to have a stable foundation for the rearing of children.
No fault divorce makes it easy for two people to break up a family. Though a couple may have serious problems, having the out of divorce can often make people look for a way out rather than hash out their differences.
Now that breaking up a family is relatively easy, the whole purpose of marriage (making a foundation for a family) is compromised. That opens the door to expanding the definition of marriage and thereby the definition of family. Moving the goalposts indeed.
The morality of abortion is not a religious belief, any more than the morality of slavery, apartheid, rape, larceny, murder or arson is a religious belief. These are norms of the natural law of mankind and can be legislated even in a completely religionless society.
However, even using your example, heterosexuals are still responsible for THEIR OWN marriages and noone else is responsible for them. You can blame no fault divorce all you want but in the end it's the people, not the policies of no fault divorce, that make their own decisions.
"The crisis will end when fear changes sides" - Pablo Iglesias Turrión
"Austerity is used as a cover to reconfigure society and increase inequality and injustice." - Jeremy Corbyn
"Yes I read the 9th [amendment]. It doesn't say **** about abortion." -Jamesrage
We just say "homophobic" because it is easier.
"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos