• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

More change the system. Find a way to remove money from the equation. This would likely improve everything involved.

BTW, money and the link to business is at every level and not just the federal level.

I can agree with that too. It is hard to fix a big machine...easy to fix a small one.
 
No Perry, My complaint is the childish nature of liberals, progressives, either declared or pseudo intellectual, supposed independents, others, undisclosed, moderates, or any other dumb assery that gets posted on these boards in the form of supposed debate.

It happens all around and really, that's a side issue.

Now Perry, until recently you and I, although not always eye to eye had some minor agreement on some things, but as is the usual case with those who can't stand when there is someone else that disagrees with their POV, the resort is usually with weak ass arguments, to attack personally, demean, and ridicule their opponent. It is a well worn strategy of the far liberal left since the days of Allenski, and most recently unmasked to the masses through the utter failure of messaging from the current administration. So you will excuse me if I dismissed your irrelevant arguments, or at the least the ones that were so void of actual point as to be utterly laughable.

You need to point out why they are irrelevant to have any validity whatsoever.
 
enne
Sadly none. Both political parties are set up so that they put in office who they want in office. Most elections come down to two choices. Who the Dems tell you to vote for and who the Reps tell you to vote for. Neither serves the interest of the general public. Neither party will allow anyone to get onto one of their tickets who will promote change or go against the grain of the party for what that person believes would be in the general public's

In Utah the Tea Party beat Bennett of Utah. As an aside, that was good but Bennett should be in prison for what he allowed happen to the economy. Anyway, his replacement was one of the ones who voted against the detention bill.

The problem is that so many seem to think that because things haven't been turned on their heads overnite that those who are deciding that things need changed are failing. Maybe in the end they will but few changes happened quickly.

There are many who dismissed those who wanted to see changes as radicals and should be stopped.
 
You need to point out why they are irrelevant to have any validity whatsoever.

What? I need to prove your irrelevance in order for my opinion to be valid? HA! That is a hoot dude....I don't need to prove a damned thing to you, or anyone else. Your problem with assuming that you know it all is, make NO mistake, YOUR problem, not mine....

Unbelievable.


j-mac
 
What? I need to prove your irrelevance in order for my opinion to be valid? HA! That is a hoot dude....I don't need to prove a damned thing to you, or anyone else. Your problem with assuming that you know it all is, make NO mistake, YOUR problem, not mine....

Unbelievable.


j-mac

It's too bad. I really wished you had a valid arguement.
 
I suspect that there is much that we know little about. Unless you think you know it all....


j-mac

I'm looking for something more specific. What was your purpose with the comment?
 
Back
Top Bottom