Page 11 of 37 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 361

Thread: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

  1. #101
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    12-29-15 @ 09:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,747

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by 1Perry View Post
    So, I'll simply not assume and come to the conclusion that you would rather not answer.
    I attempted to be nice. I found your tact ignorant, and disappointing.

    That is what this thread is about.
    Far from it. It is about where they violated statutes.

    Los Angeles City Atty. Carmen Trutanich is considering a lawsuit against Occupy L.A. protesters to reimburse the city for damage caused during the occupation of the City Hall lawn.


    Sorry though, City Hall, not courthouse.
    Damages. Whether there are actually any or not, I do not know. However, her lawsuit will have to be based on statutes.

    It was a question. The way to get rid of any doubt is to answer the question.
    Again, your query was ignorant and disappointing. If you cannot avoid such ad hominems, maybe quit the thread.

    Napolis. About 8 months. The rest of the employee's.
    US Army. 82 Abn and 5th SF. 7 years.

    Get back to me when you have some credibility actually defended the rights of others.

  2. #102
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Seen
    03-16-12 @ 10:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,624

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Since this is about L.A. Here is their law.




    Check it out people....it is AGAINST the law.


    j-mac
    Nobody has argued that violence is lawful.

  3. #103
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Seen
    03-16-12 @ 10:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,624

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by Eighty Deuce View Post
    I attempted to be nice. I found your tact ignorant, and disappointing.
    Then just answer the questions. The arguement is that allowing protest can cost society money. As can gun ownership. Do you support the same restrictions on gun ownership?

    Far from it. It is about where they violated statutes.
    The city is not aresting anyone for violating statutes.

    Damages. Whether there are actually any or not, I do not know. However, her lawsuit will have to be based on statutes.
    If a fountain was damaged, that would be criminal. If there was damage to the lawn because of people protesting, let them try and sue. I'm betting they don't and if they did, they would lose.

    US Army. 82 Abn and 5th SF. 7 years.

    Get back to me when you have some credibility actually defended the rights of others.
    I appreciate ones military service but Timothy McVeigh served also. It does not give you a lifetime pass.

  4. #104
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,525

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by 1Perry View Post
    Nobody has argued that violence is lawful.

    Sorry Perry, it isn't just about violence, the statutes are clear.


    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  5. #105
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,525

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by 1Perry View Post
    The city is not aresting anyone for violating statutes.
    Ah, but they are. That is the basis for all arrests.



    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  6. #106
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Seen
    03-16-12 @ 10:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,624

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Ah, but they are. That is the basis for all arrests.

    j-mac
    The article is about wanting to sue, not arrest.

  7. #107
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,525

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by 1Perry View Post
    The article is about wanting to sue, not arrest.
    Absolutely, and because of that the line of discussion led in the direction naturally of what is legal, and what isn't, which brings us here. Now it seems, and I could be wrong about this, but now that we have arrived at the point where it is clear fact that Occupy protesters are breaking the law, which could easily part of any argument brought from a law suit toward any of them in damages, you seem to want to not delve into that aspect....Why?


    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  8. #108
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    12-29-15 @ 09:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,747

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by 1Perry View Post
    Then just answer the questions. The arguement is that allowing protest can cost society money. As can gun ownership. Do you support the same restrictions on gun ownership?
    Start a thread about the 2nd Amendment. See who comes to your party, and address them there.

    The city is not aresting anyone for violating statutes.
    But the propiety of statutes has certainly been an issue in the thread.

    If a fountain was damaged, that would be criminal. If there was damage to the lawn because of people protesting, let them try and sue. I'm betting they don't and if they did, they would lose.
    Again, the conversation has long gone beyond such. For all I know the dumbass mayor is trying to save some political face, but otherwise has little chance of recovering either damages, or saving face.

    I appreciate ones military service but Timothy McVeigh served also. It does not give you a lifetime pass.
    Point is, you lack the credibility to raise the issue, or assume anything about me regards such, in this thread with me. When you rate such, then I might give you the time of day on it. Won't be tomorrow though.

  9. #109
    Sage
    Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:11 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    67,677

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by Mycroft View Post
    Ummm...

    Exactly who would they send the bill to?
    ummmm the 300 they arrested... for starters.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have pooped in public, even in public neighborhoods.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    I'm sexist and hypocritical, lol:

  10. #110
    Sage
    Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:11 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    67,677

    Re: L.A. might sue Occupy L.A. protestors for financial damages

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Exactly which person(s) are they going to try to sue and exactly how is the city going to prove those people were anywhere responsible for the actions of the other protestors?

    The city is acting moronic on this one. The city will lose easily in court, and hopefully hose they try to sue will countersue the city and win.
    What an absoluely idiotic view. They will start by suing the 300 arrested and they would lose for what reason? And counter sue? People like you are a huge disgrace to America and how we are viewed world wide with our sue happy culture.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have pooped in public, even in public neighborhoods.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    I'm sexist and hypocritical, lol:

Page 11 of 37 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •