- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
ATLANTA — A federal judge on Thursday blocked the most controversial parts of South Carolina’s new immigration law from taking effect next month.
At the same time, SCOTUS will be hearing Arizona's case, which is very similar. I do not like laws that promote racial profiling, but one of the decisions the court made to strike down parts of the law was ridiculous.
He also blocked provisions that made it a crime to harbor or transport an illegal immigrant.
Yes, ridiculous. So those who knowingly harbor and/or transport criminals, and assist them in committing a crime, are not guilty themselves?
Here is the way I see it - I hope the Supremes do their job and protect the constitutional rights of everbody, but at the same time, I would like to see them uphold the law, and agree that it is a crime to harbor illegals. I mean, come on - If someone helps an illegal violate the law, then he himself is an accessory to the crime. That judge is an idiot.
Article is here.
Last edited: