• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Republicans Cave on Payroll Tax Cuts Extension

Yes, because unlike the GOP, the Dems do not always vote the same. There's an old saying that applies - Democrats have to fall in love; Republicans have to fall in line

Is this a joke ? One need look no further than Obamacare, the FLorida Flim Flam, Louisiana Purchase, and Corhhusker Kickback to see that Dems could care less about bi-partisanship. The fact is that Clinton stalled, then lost his shirt in the '94 midterms, and then moved to the center, dragged there by the 104th Congress.
 
Oh come on. To think that we didn't see Pelosi walking the halls with that over sized cartoon gavel, whipping the demo's into a singular voting block is laughable.


j-mac

Another j-mac post, devoid of facts.
 
That's because you're partisan.

Your comment is especially laughable since it follows an example of just the opposite.

It just proves that ideologues can't accept reality. Even when acknowledging facts that prove the opposite, they claim it supports their view :cuckoo:
 
Is this a joke ? One need look no further than Obamacare, the FLorida Flim Flam, Louisiana Purchase, and Corhhusker Kickback to see that Dems could care less about bi-partisanship. The fact is that Clinton stalled, then lost his shirt in the '94 midterms, and then moved to the center, dragged there by the 104th Congress.

That was delusional. Obamacare revealed many dems (Nelson, Lieberman, and others) who did not support it and voted against it.

Once again, it's shown that some people have an endless capacity to deny reality, thinking that facts which prove the opposite support their position.
 
That was delusional. Obamacare revealed many dems (Nelson, Lieberman, and others) who did not support it and voted against it.

Once again, it's shown that some people have an endless capacity to deny reality, thinking that facts which prove the opposite support their position.

They voted for it. ;)

Tell us all how we deny reality again. Seems it gives you a boner.
 
I wish there was a middle finger smiley.

j-mac
 
Ok. Then something that has bugged me for some time now...And I know that it isn't on point of the thread, but if I could, Why not show what your lean is? Why hide behind the "undisclosed", or "other", or any designation that seems to be rather deceptive as to your ideology?

I think ideology is completely irrelevant and distracting. My opinion is the same regardless of whether you put a label on me or not. And they don't really say much about a person even if you do use a label. So I will respectfully decline.
 
They voted for it. ;)

Tell us all how we deny reality again. Seems it gives you a boner.

Umm, not all of the dems voted for it. And since you requested it
Once again, it's shown that some people have an endless capacity to deny reality, thinking that facts which prove the opposite support their position.
 
Umm, not all of the dems voted for it. And since you requested it

Yes, in the end, all the Dems you listed voted to pass Obamacare. Every one.
 
Back
Top Bottom