- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,713
- Reaction score
- 1,907
- Location
- The Derby City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
It is irrelevant. Please stay on topic.
No chamber ever votes on the other chamber's bills with "no changes" unless it is extremely non-controversial legislation. Why would they do that? The point of considering a bill is to consider changes to it. Are you suggesting the Senate should have held a vote on the bill without allowing any amendments to it?
Yes, actually it happens all the time.
Yes, they should have definitely voted on the original House bill with no amendments.
Stop pretending you know what you're talking about or that you have a point. You are hanging your hat on a piece of useless, irrelevant information as if it matters. Now that is childish.
First you claim that the Senate voted on the House bill unchanged, then you finally admit you were wrong. And I'm the one that doesn't know what I'm talking about ???
That's hilarious and childish.