• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time Magazine's Person Of The Year Is THE PROTESTER

No your comment is idiotic

The difference is Fiddy may have a few posts that are idiotic, versus all of your posts which are idiotic.

Another problem, you can't seem to recognize idiotic posts probably because you post them every day... therefore your credibility on idiotic posts is crawling in negative numbers. Just sayin'...
 
No your comment is idiotic

Not really. I was just making conversation. It's not going so well over there in China, despite some effort. If you find that idiotic, meh.
 
Last edited:
The difference is Fiddy may have a few posts that are idiotic, versus all of your posts which are idiotic.

Another problem, you can't seem to recognize idiotic posts probably because you post them every day... therefore your credibility on idiotic posts is crawling in negative numbers. Just sayin'...

You hurt my fewwwings...

:lamo

I guess im just a big idiot... Awwhhhh man..

 
Not really. I was just making conversation. It's not going so well over there in China, despite some effort. If you find that idiotic, meh.

I apologize i guess i took your comment the wrong way.
 
You hurt my fewwwings...

:lamo

I guess im just a big idiot... Awwhhhh man..


See, you're not the tough guy you're portraying yourself as... don't be too hard on yourself. Anyone can make a mistake... over... and over.... and over.....
 
See, you're not the tough guy you're portraying yourself as... don't be too hard on yourself. Anyone can make a mistake... over... and over.... and over.....

Hahaha i portray myself as a tough guy? Yep! Sure do!
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stick the topic. Future posts attacking each other will result in an infraction and a thread ban.
 
This is the same publication that elected Hitler and Stalin man of the year. A lot to be proud of there. Can't wait to make that list. :lamo
 
This is the same publication that elected Hitler and Stalin man of the year. A lot to be proud of there. Can't wait to make that list. :lamo

Be sure that the years that Hitler & Stalin were named Man of the Year, their influence on the world was significant.

Its not a popularity contest. Its about significance.
 
This is the same publication that elected Hitler and Stalin man of the year. A lot to be proud of there. Can't wait to make that list. :lamo

You misunderstand the purpose of the publication.
 
The award isn't always handed out to a "positive" person(s), it is also given to "negative" person(s). I think "The Protester" is very vauge and open to interpretation as to whether it is good or bad. Whether one agrees with OWS, the Arab Spring, the Tea Party or any other movement, doesn't diminish it's influence around the globe in the past couple of years, more so this year. While I may disagree with Time's "angle" so to speak, I felt it was a fitting "Person of the Year" and find no fault with it. Only the truly partisan from either side would see this as anything other than fitting IMO.
 
The award isn't always handed out to a "positive" person(s), it is also given to "negative" person(s). I think "The Protester" is very vauge and open to interpretation as to whether it is good or bad. Whether one agrees with OWS, the Arab Spring, the Tea Party or any other movement, doesn't diminish it's influence around the globe in the past couple of years, more so this year. While I may disagree with Time's "angle" so to speak, I felt it was a fitting "Person of the Year" and find no fault with it. Only the truly partisan from either side would see this as anything other than fitting IMO.

Tea Party protest = bad
OWS protest = good

Now you know Hugh how they should be rated. :2razz:
 
Tea Party protest = bad
OWS protest = good

Now you know Hugh how they should be rated. :2razz:


I still dont view them as the law when it comes to picking person of the year...and Ill still pick my own :)
 
The award isn't always handed out to a "positive" person(s), it is also given to "negative" person(s). I think "The Protester" is very vauge and open to interpretation as to whether it is good or bad. Whether one agrees with OWS, the Arab Spring, the Tea Party or any other movement, doesn't diminish it's influence around the globe in the past couple of years, more so this year. While I may disagree with Time's "angle" so to speak, I felt it was a fitting "Person of the Year" and find no fault with it. Only the truly partisan from either side would see this as anything other than fitting IMO.

Hitler was man of the year in 1938.
 
I protest time magazine doing this!
 
Every year this comes up and every year we have to explain to everyone that this is not a popularity contest and the winner does not always represnt the best of our race, I almost wish Time would stop doing it so I would not have to explain this to people every year
 
Every year this comes up and every year we have to explain to everyone that this is not a popularity contest and the winner does not always represnt the best of our race, I almost wish Time would stop doing it so I would not have to explain this to people every year

Heh, I wish people could read and pay attention so I wouldn't have to explain it to them. Oh well.
 
I know that, Thunder was a bit confused, big boy.

No, you are again wrong, my friend.

OWS did not inspire the Arab Spring, and I never said they did.

However, you dishonestly claimed that the cover of Time magazine says "From the Arab Spring to Occupy Wall Street".
 
Last edited:
Every year this comes up and every year we have to explain to everyone that this is not a popularity contest and the winner does not always represnt the best of our race, I almost wish Time would stop doing it so I would not have to explain this to people every year


Maybe this thread should be in the bias section, seeing as how Time's PoY for the past few years is really nothing more than a skewed representation of whom the progressive left is in love with.


j-mac
 
Back
Top Bottom