• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time Magazine's Person Of The Year Is THE PROTESTER

again, this source is a right-wing, anti-Muslim, anti-Arab biased rag.

please find an article critical of Time magazine from a slightly less biased source.



If it's so biased, it should be easy for even those stingy with the intellectual prowess to prove it's content incorrect, good sir.
 
Time’s ‘Person of the Year’: Dishonest and Delusional | FrontPage Magazine



Maybe you can show me in the article where they included them.

Page 2:
Time Magazine said:
In the U.S., the Obama campaign was in part a feel-good protest movement that galvanized young people, and then its shocking success and the Wall Street bailout produced an angry and shockingly successful populist protest movement in the Tea Party, which has far outlasted its expected shelf life.

Emphasis mine. Would you like me to keep looking, because I found your answer on page 2. There could be more as there are about 5 more pages.

*Edit:

It's a big internet out there, Rev, maybe choose a slightly less hacky source to get your info?
 
..Emphasis mine. Would you like me to keep looking, because I found your answer on page 2. There could be more as there are about 5 more pages.

*Edit:

It's a big internet out there, Rev, maybe choose a slightly less hacky source to get your info?

ah, so the article DOES mentions the TP?

good to know. I'll use this info to counter all the silly & ignorant attacks against Time magazine.

and yes, Frontpage Mag is a HORRIBLE source for any information. might as well get info from American Free Press.
 
Page 2:


Emphasis mine. Would you like me to keep looking, because I found your answer on page 2. There could be more as there are about 5 more pages.

*Edit:

It's a big internet out there, Rev, maybe choose a slightly less hacky source to get your info?


Less hacky sources are boring! :mrgreen:


Good find though.
 
It's a good thing, because if TM decided not to mention the TP, they would lose almost all credibility. Like it or not, the TP was there and threw a lot of weight around with those protests.
 
It's a good thing, because if TM decided not to mention the TP, they would lose almost all credibility. Like it or not, the TP was there and threw a lot of weight around with those protests.

it was stupid for folks to say that the article didn't include TP, simply due to the picture on the cover.

folks should have the integrity & honesty to actually read articles before they soo vehemently condemn them.
 
it was stupid for folks to say that the article didn't include TP, simply due to the picture on the cover.

folks should have the integrity & honesty to actually read articles before they soo vehemently condemn them.




It's been excluded from the cover in favor of #ows..... You should think before you chortle some nonsense on "dishonesty"
 
see, this is some of the dishonesty I was referring to.

the front cover doesn't say "from the Arab Spring to OWS".


It surely does, oh wait, you are substituting semantics for intellectual discourse... My bad.
 
It surely does, oh wait, you are substituting semantics for intellectual discourse... My bad.

semantics? this isn't an issue of semantics.

its an issue of purposefully falsely-quoting the cover of the magazine.

the title does not say "from Arab Spring to OWS", and yet you stated it did. you omitted much of the actual text.

why? because the actual text doesn't support your biased claim.
 
Last edited:
armed Muslim Brotherhood protester in Egypt?

attention-whoring lazy rich kid in Seattle?

wow, you're dishonest discriptions of the OWSers and the protesters in Tahrir Square are amazing.

No, I pretty much nailed it.
 
semantics? this isn't an issue of semantics.

its an issue of purposefully falsely-quoting the cover of the magazine.

the title does not say "from Arab Spring to OWS", and yet you stated it did. you omitted much of the actual text.

why? because the actual text doesn't support your biased claim.



I don't have the desire to engage your puerile antics. sorry.
 
Last edited:
Other way around big guy....
I'm still waiting on your point.

As a side-conversation from this strange dispute, Occupy China hasn't been doing so well.
 
Back
Top Bottom