How about the OWS is actually disjointed and not plugged in to the conventional "buy your media presentation" and focus that goes with all the large monied media campaigns that we are exposed to on a daily basis without being aware that a great deal of the media opinions/stories/events are subliminally sponsored. Political, financial, intelligence, educational, and any other agenda that starts ginnin' up a little media to gain favorable exposure to their paradigm. Lotsa' people ain't articulate and the 99% is lotsa' people by definition. If you'll go with recent recollections in the media in the past decade ginnin' up that Iraq war with the Iraqi need for freedom, democracy, get rid o' WMDs, etc, and it all sounding very reasonable, even noble, and that's what money and a focused ad campaign can buy to make something downright evil look good. Somehow the confusion with OWS relates to a sincere purpose, not some ginned up agenda.
“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
1-Watching the debates each one of the possible republican candidates clearly expressed thier opposition to the draw down of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan accept Ron Paul
2-Each one of the republican candidates has proclaimed wall street's innocence
Gingrich the leader "presently" of the republican polls has been very clear about his position on both issues he is against the draw downs and loves wall street, Ron Paul is to radical in his views for me but at least honest. I do not see any way to vote for any republican candidate left in the field that only leaves one choice President Obama