Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 61

Thread: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

  1. #11
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    84,959

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by rathi View Post
    The Manning situation is absurd. He should have been taken to trial for releasing classified information, easily convicted and sentenced. The lack of real harm from the leaked documents should have been a mitigating factor in his sentencing. Justice would have been served and the law upheld. There is absolutely no reason to blatantly violate both the constitution and the UCMJ by holding him so long. Its completely insane to undermine our entire legal system to hold someone prisoner when you have him nailed on an open and shut case that will land him in prison anyway.
    The guy that shot at the White House a couple weeks ago didn't kill anyone and no one was ever in danger of being killed, or even injured.

    Is he any less guilty of making an attempt on the president's life?
    Quote Originally Posted by americanwoman View Post
    So there is absolutely no evidence this woman, whom you called a slut, did this but you are ready to take someone's word as evidence. Guess you don't think witch hunts have to end when it's going after the certain people.

  2. #12
    Professor

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    02-26-18 @ 03:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,527

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    was he a traitor who exposed military secrets to the detriment of our nation

    or

    was he a patriot who exposed wrong doing, conducted in our name, which was cloaked with security classifications

    we may know his motivations after the article 32 hearing in a couple of weeks. incarcerate the traitor. praise the whistleblower
    And what wrong doing did Pvt Manning "expose"? Specifically?

  3. #13
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    84,959

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    was he a traitor who exposed military secrets to the detriment of our nation

    or

    was he a patriot who exposed wrong doing, conducted in our name, which was cloaked with security classifications

    we may know his motivations after the article 32 hearing in a couple of weeks.
    He broke the law and put lives in danger. Even if no one was killed, he's guilty of treason. Was Benedict Arnold any less of a traitor, because the Colonials won the war?

    incarcerate the traitor. praise the whistleblower
    But...but...but...the law...

    Was the occutard shooter at the White House trying to murder the president, or protect the country from more of his damaging policies?
    Quote Originally Posted by americanwoman View Post
    So there is absolutely no evidence this woman, whom you called a slut, did this but you are ready to take someone's word as evidence. Guess you don't think witch hunts have to end when it's going after the certain people.

  4. #14
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    03-05-18 @ 03:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,862

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Several thoughts:

    1) His lawyer claims? So it is not fact, just the claim of some one trying to make a case

    2) Even if true, "no real damage to national security" is not the same thing as "no damage".

    3) None of that changes the fact he broke the law. A drunk driver does not have to do damage to be guilty of drunk driving.

    4) He is still, thankfully, never going to ever be free again in his life. I almost regret that they no longer make big rocks into little rocks at Leavenworth.
    I agree. It is one thing if someone comes forward to bring light on a lawor leaders are breaking, and quite another to simply leak a ton of information. And if he really believes what he did was right, he should do it in the open and accept the consequences of breaking the law. In any case, he did break the alw.

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

  5. #15
    Sage
    Renae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Antonio Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:16 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    41,153
    Blog Entries
    16

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    was he a traitor who exposed military secrets to the detriment of our nation

    or

    was he a patriot who exposed wrong doing, conducted in our name, which was cloaked with security classifications

    we may know his motivations after the article 32 hearing in a couple of weeks. incarcerate the traitor. praise the whistleblower
    Shoot the bastard and send a message:

    "Treason is not tolerated."

    Don't give a **** what his motives were, he released classified data, to a foreign entity. Whistle blowers contact media organizations and the appropriate legal entities.
    Better Living Through Regulation - DNC



  6. #16
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    49,521

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    praise the whistleblower
    There's ways to legally "whistleblow". He didn't follow them. He's not a whisteblower in any sense that matters in this case.
    Quote Originally Posted by MrWonka View Post
    In fact, I would wager to you that within 10 years of today's date that stupid MAGA hat will be registered as a symbol of hate on par with a Swastika.

  7. #17
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    49,521

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Was the occutard shooter at the White House
    There was no "occutard" shooter at the white house, any more than there was a "Teatard" shooter of gabby giffords. ****ing ridiculous.
    Quote Originally Posted by MrWonka View Post
    In fact, I would wager to you that within 10 years of today's date that stupid MAGA hat will be registered as a symbol of hate on par with a Swastika.

  8. #18
    A Man Without A Country
    Mr. Invisible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:35 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    4,985
    Blog Entries
    71

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by Fishstyx View Post
    And what wrong doing did Pvt Manning "expose"? Specifically?
    Sure. He exposed the fact that US soldiers were committing war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Cables Reveal 2006 Summary Execution of Civilian Family in Iraq -- News from Antiwar.com) (New Statesman - One year in jail, Bradley Manning is a hero) Also that the US was ignoring torture (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...military-leaks).

    Some high-up people are even supporting him (US Intelligence Veteran Defends Bradley Manning And WikiLeaks - OpEd) (WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning - WikiLeaks - Salon.com).

    The US government should be on trial for having Bradley Manning in solitary confinement for approximately two years. Solitary confinement amounts to torture (Prolonged solitary confinement is torture, says expert | United Nations Radio) (http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/fil...%20Prisons.pdf) (Solitary Confinement: The Invisible Torture | Wired Science | Wired.com).


    I find it quite disturbing that so many people are angry that he released files that showed the horrid things that were going on in Iraq and Afghanistan. We should be happy that these things have been revealed that so we can correct them rather than keep them in the darkness.
    "And in the end, we were all just humans, drunk on the idea that love, only love, could heal our brokenness."

  9. #19
    long standing member
    justabubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,653

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    There's ways to legally "whistleblow". He didn't follow them. He's not a whisteblower in any sense that matters in this case.
    interesting perspective
    what was the proper and specific method for someone in the military to blow the whistle about committed atrocities and violations of international conduct
    we are negotiating about dividing a pizza and in the meantime israel is eating it[
    Quote Originally Posted by oneworld2 View Post
    Except it's not their land and it was a war of conquest wrapped up as a defensive war. Subsequent events confirm this

  10. #20
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    49,521

    Re: Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    interesting perspective
    what was the proper and specific method for someone in the military to blow the whistle about committed atrocities and violations of international conduct
    He can follow the steps laid out in the Military Whistleblower Protection Act, which he would've recieved training on as a DOD employee.
    Quote Originally Posted by MrWonka View Post
    In fact, I would wager to you that within 10 years of today's date that stupid MAGA hat will be registered as a symbol of hate on par with a Swastika.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •