Kinda looks like the winger talking report have been debunked by the latest CBO report.It raised GDP, between 0.2 % and 1.3%,increasd employment, fulltime jobs at that.
The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
1983 GDP Growth
I II III IV
5.1 9.3 8.1 8.5
I'm travelling and enjoying family, so my responses will be limited for a while.
However, in response, the heck with the economists, let's look at what the actual people alive at the time, and living through all this, did at the time.
They elected FDR in 1932, re-elected him in 1936, re-elected him in 1940, and re-elected him yet again in 1944!
All the 80 year later economist looking at a bunch of numbers, do NOT trump the vote of millions of people living it at the time.
I believe FDR was good for the country because the majority supported him 4 times, and that says a lot!
⚧ C.T.L.W. You figure it out
My Endo doc went over my blood work. "I see your estrogen level is now at 315, do you feel like you have too much Estrogen now?"
I told her "... N... N.. No..." and started crying.