This was the link I was reading when I posted that about the banks.GRR..
< Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks Undisclosed $13B>
< The Federal Reserve and the big banks fought for more than two years to keep details of the largest bailout in U.S. history a secret. Now, the rest of the world can see what it was missing. >
Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks Undisclosed $13B - Bloomberg
The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
List of recessions in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe decline in government spending at the end of World War II led to an enormous drop in gross domestic product, making this technically a recession. This was the result of demobilization and the shift from a wartime to peacetime economy. The post-war years were unusual in a number of ways (unemployment was never high) and this era may be considered a "sui generis end-of-the-war recession".
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.
Again, I would think that the scientists would make themselves, and their data known. Which btw, how many things have we heard over the years to be bad for us concerning food, only to have them later say that they weren't as bad as they thought? Alot.Or most scientists concluded that a food aditive was carcinogenic?
I'd laugh, because the case so far is not that. I mean look, even the wording you use says "was".... What happened? did it clear up?....hahaha....Or if the vast majority of climatologists had concluded that anthropogenic global warming was a real problem?
It is when it relies only on your say so.Pointing out that most experts say X, Y, or Z is not intended to stifle debate.
Not based on what you alone say. Now maybe if you posted something credible, then it could be studied, but no, you don't have exclusivity to 'fact'....It is simply a fact relevant to the debate.
I wasn't aware that you had to be 'expert' in everything in order to offer an opinion on this site. That is interesting, in order to consider your word expert then, could you provide us with your bona fides then?It only offends you because you generally find yourself inexpertly arguing points that most experts do not support.
I invite you to study up on this, it has been tried before, and failed horribly...
Weimar Republic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia