• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anonymous Attacks Facebook

I must have a bunch of really smart friends on facebook because I have not seen anything. Now, I have seen friends posting something about their friends leaving porn on their feed. I also saw a link that said 99% of people cant watch this for 15 seconds but I would never click on that. Other than that, no problems.
 
I hate FB. It's intrusive and no...you can't remove anything once you join. Now it is where anyplace you go on the net you are invited or urged "log in" via you FB.
Talk about Big Brother.
 
I hate FB. It's intrusive and no...you can't remove anything once you join. Now it is where anyplace you go on the net you are invited or urged "log in" via you FB.
Talk about Big Brother.

I agree Enola. It's everywhere and I have a problem with something like this being so pervasive in our lives.

The way they roll out changes, roll them back and then go forward again with the same change or more, really bugs me too. Zuckerberg is always acting in bad faith, IMO.
 
What's even scarier is all those websites that go along with the intrusion. It is up to the people to decide if their privacy is important to them or not. Family? Friends? If they can't email me and keep it between us, then they aren't family or friends I want.

It's no different than sitting in a restaurant with your loved ones and using a bullhorn that is heard around the world everything you say. EVERYTHING. And stating you can make it private? Um hm. "I'm from the IRS and I'm here to help you".
"Come into my parlor" said the spider to the fly.
 
What's even scarier is all those websites that go along with the intrusion. It is up to the people to decide if their privacy is important to them or not. Family? Friends? If they can't email me and keep it between us, then they aren't family or friends I want.

It's no different than sitting in a restaurant with your loved ones and using a bullhorn that is heard around the world everything you say. EVERYTHING. And stating you can make it private? Um hm. "I'm from the IRS and I'm here to help you".
"Come into my parlor" said the spider to the fly.

It's exactly that, and there is literally no way to have a Facebook and protect your privacy fully. I am no slouch, when it comes to digital rights and internet awareness. I grew up with a geek who's been in the tech world since the dawn of computers - that stuff is nailed into my head hard.

But even with my savvy, I couldn't do it. I was aware of that - I never posted anything I wouldn't leave laying around on Facebook. I knew that wasn't enough, but the convenience got me. Eventually it'll hurt you, if for no other reason than that you can't get rid of stalkers and Facebook is totally unresponsive to this kind of thing. I was fairly well-known in an industry for a while, saw some bad stuff going down, whistleblew, exited stage-right, and spent the next 6 months fighting off stalkers and other malicious internet activity.

The only solution wound up being deleting almost every online account I had, abandoning all of my old usernames, and even vanquishing my shortened first name from everything except my official published works (there's more, but I won't bore you with the 20-page list of everything I had to do to wipe the slate). Do you have any idea how much work that is when you have an internet history going back to 1999? It took months. I even had to root my phone because it wouldn't stop phoning home to Facebook, and it kept re-activating my account. Had I not had a Facebook, I probably could have worked it out without so much slash-and-burn.

And that's to say nothing of the general concern of someone who has shown himself to be a major stalker, and instills that mentality in his employees, having virtually all of your online usage data.

I got in under the line. Before Timeline came out, and in a part of history where it's still possible (if extremely difficult) to mostly start over. But in a few years it probably won't be. And even with how thorough of a job I did, Facebook will always have a crapton of data on me from my 5 years on their site and the tracking they did. I still have to watch my cookies for signs of Facebook.

It's pervasive. And people who don't care aren't paying attention. People who do care and don't do anything are making the same stupid mistake I did, essentially standing around and waiting for it to bite them.

No amount of convenience is worth that. I'm a full-grown adult and it's high time I learned how to remember to send a damn email. It's not worth it.
 
Last edited:
Don't tell me you dummies used your real name on your facebook pages. You can't get much more naive than that.
 
Don't tell me you dummies used your real name on your facebook pages. You can't get much more naive than that.

Well - years back I made the mistake of signing up to Facebook. Even without using my real name (something I never do) it's programmed to snag contacts from your email. Instantly I was receiving unwanted 'hi's' from people my Mom keeps up with because she was on my email contact list.

I logged on twice - and haven't gone back.

maybe things have changed since then but I don't want or need anyone from my childhood days asking me 'how are you?' now that I'm an adult.
 
Chaos On Facebook

Yikes! Half my friends over on facebook are busy apologizing for posts they never made and never saw, but that appeared on the walls of their friends as if they had. This is evidentially part of an attack on facebook by Anonymous:





http://articles.cnn.com/2011-08-09/t...ser?_s=PM:TECH

If you are on facebook and need help making your account more private or secure, I might be able to help. However, there are some excellent resources out there on the 'net as well. As far as I can tell, I have not contracted this virus, myself.

Onna my friends recommends that if you get a notice of a photo tag, do not open it. If you get a notification that a friend reported you for offensive behavior, etc., do not open it. If you are sent a video which says 99% of people can not watch this for more the 15 seconds, do not open -- it is also a virus. And do not open any links sent to you by friends via facebook chat.

I am appreciative of Anon. For taking it upon themselves to have the authority of ruining our relationships in an attempt to criticize Facebook. No, really, I think it's fantastic that messianic college students and dropouts believe I cannot be trusted to make these sorts of security decisions for myself and need their Red Bull drinkers to guide me through this difficult and trying time in my life.
 
Who cares?


Tim-

Those who are not foolish enough to leave their doors unlocked in a world of bad neighborhoods.
Reap what you sow. If you like FB, have at it. Those who know better will be the "we told you so" crowd.
 
Don't tell me you dummies used your real name on your facebook pages. You can't get much more naive than that.

Nope. But not using your real name doesn't do much to help you from malicious attacks.
 
I can't blame them if the group's claims are correct.
 
are you actually going to justify a cyber-attack against a privately owned website, enjoyed by hundreds of millions of people???
Sorry, but I don't give much credence to passive-aggressive baiters.
 
Sorry, but I don't give much credence to passive-aggressive baiters.

I provided fair criticism to your comment. Do you really think such actions against websites, used by hundreds of millions of people, is warranted?
 
I can't blame them if the group's claims are correct.

There's little doubt the group's claims are largely correct...but they could have crashed the FB servers. Or dug into Zuckerman's private life. Or exposed the deliberate choices that placed millions of FB users at risk.

Any of these would have been preferable. All they did do was attack FB users...the very group they claim to be so concerned over.
 
Sorry, but I don't give much credence to passive-aggressive baiters.

What was "passive aggressive"? Anon's attack? Thunder's reply?

Methinks someone needs to study up on the definition of "passive aggressive". For example, the precedeing sentence was an implied insult, suggesting that you, Wake, used a term you did not understand. An implied insult would be one, but not the only, type of "passive aggressive" speech. It's crappy debating, as well.....but that's another thread.

This sentence here is just plain, old, everday aggressive:

Can you please confine your pissing match with Thunder to threads about pissing matches, and discuss the Op or get the **** off this thread?

Personally, I favor plain aggression, within limits.

I assume the difference between "aggressive" and "passive aggressive" is now readily apparent to you, Wake? Care to try again?
 
Last edited:
There's little doubt the group's claims are largely correct...but they could have crashed the FB servers. Or dug into Zuckerman's private life. Or exposed the deliberate choices that placed millions of FB users at risk. Any of these would have been preferable. All they did do was attack FB users...the very group they claim to be so concerned over.
That was on my mind, and it's reasonable. Having my own FB account, I wasn't affected. It didn't affect me so I really don't care. To me that is part of humanity, to not care if it doesn't affect you. The nation doesn't mourn when a poor villager in Southern Africa dies. I do not trust Zuckerburg. I don't condone "Anonymous," but I don't care about their actions much, either. I am indifferent. It's doubtful FB would heed "Anonymous" in the slightest because FB is powerful and doesn't care, either. That only adds weight to my indifference. Children being exposed to improper material isn't right, so if children were affected by the actions of this group, then that is weight against them. Perhaps that group had to resort to such tactics because otherwise they wouldn't be heard? New info would really help.
 
Meanwhile, I was browing new movies coming out soon and at the end of the vid, it said to learn more about behind the scenes stories, LOG IN TO FACEBOOK.

What's next? Ya gotta be on FB to buy groceries? rent a car? purchase airline tickets? Shop online? go to the doctor?
 
There's little doubt the group's claims are largely correct...but they could have crashed the FB servers. Or dug into Zuckerman's private life. Or exposed the deliberate choices that placed millions of FB users at risk.

Any of these would have been preferable. All they did do was attack FB users...the very group they claim to be so concerned over.

Kind of like he does everyone else, eh? (digging into private lives)
With that said, I think the Anon hackers need to concentrate on the problem and not the innocent users. So I am against their methods, but their point is crystal clear and I agree with what they say. Just not HOW they do it.
 
Kind of like he does everyone else, eh? (digging into private lives)
With that said, I think the Anon hackers need to concentrate on the problem and not the innocent users. So I am against their methods, but their point is crystal clear and I agree with what they say. Just not HOW they do it.

Me too.

I'm onna the dumbasses who joined FB.
 
well, my FB account was severely effected.

there is no good reason for such an attack, and its criminal.

Ayup, it surely is. But good luck finding these people and bringing them to justice.
 
Back
Top Bottom