Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Taking the money away was a solution I said. The problem with that is it still has to be connected to voting as they will merely vote for the person that gives them everything they need. Its the same problem with doing favors and subsiding business or even passing things to harm business which causes not only business to try to get out to vote against any more of it but other people to get out to get control of business. Same with any sort of chance for people to get some sort of favor in government. My point is unionization in government directly effects how people vote and has to be connected if taking money out of the process is put on the table.
The point is, politiicans should nto have a financial interest at all, be it form business or workers. Aside from that. workers without any voice at all will likely be abused in one way or another. Speaking as a collective voice is one way the worker has to increase his voice at the barganing table. Government workers should not be handicapped just because they work for the government. Government leaders should be held accountable for doing their job, and not concerned with making money from those they affect.