Page 108 of 136 FirstFirst ... 85898106107108109110118 ... LastLast
Results 1,071 to 1,080 of 1355

Thread: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

  1. #1071
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,272

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Catawba View Post
    You are missing the larger point, that Obama is no progressive, and rather than the having progressive to challenge Obama in a Primary, we have the OWS. In the absence of a progressive to challenge the centrist, Obama, I am so grateful the OWS is fulfilling that role.
    Me too. With the people of this country rejecting the antisemitism, and Marxism of OWS in more and more numbers, Progressives may have to go back and hide under another rock for another 70 to 100 years.

    Thanks.


    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  2. #1072
    Disappointed Evolutionist
    Catawba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    05-28-13 @ 08:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    27,254

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    That last part means that some 72% of this country thinks that Obama has made NO progress on improving the economy. How the hell does he get elected with these numbers?

    j-mac
    He gets reelected because that the majority of the country see that the GOP has done a worse job than Obama in improving the economy.
    We choose the lesser of the evils in our elections, remember?
    Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb

  3. #1073
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,272

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Catawba View Post
    He gets reelected because that the majority of the country see that the GOP has done a worse job than Obama in improving the economy.
    We choose the lesser of the evils in our elections, remember?

    Can't really hold one party responsible for your own failures when you hold a super majority in both houses for 2/3 of the time period we are talking about.

    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  4. #1074
    Disappointed Evolutionist
    Catawba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    05-28-13 @ 08:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    27,254

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    Obama is such a loser that his only hope is the Republicans find an even bigger loser.....
    They can't miss having a bigger loser with their line up!
    Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb

  5. #1075
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,272

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Catawba View Post
    They can't miss having a bigger loser with their line up!

    Sure they could, they could back Obama....heh, heh....


    j-mac
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  6. #1076
    Disappointed Evolutionist
    Catawba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    05-28-13 @ 08:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    27,254

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Me too. With the people of this country rejecting the antisemitism, and Marxism of OWS in more and more numbers, Progressives may have to go back and hide under another rock for another 70 to 100 years.

    Thanks.


    j-mac
    Yes, I'm sure you are right that all those who hated the Marxists years in the US from the 1940's thru the 1970's, will reject the OWS.
    Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb

  7. #1077
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Romney has outlined a 59 point plan you can find here:

    Jobs | Mitt Romney for President
    Romney's plan is just to bust union capabilities and decrease corporate taxes. Nothing of substance else is mentioned in the plan.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    And Gingrich's plan is here:

    Jobs and the Economy | Newt Gingrich 2012
    Again, an empty suit. He mentions he wants to take away things he beleives are inhibiting growth, but doesn't mention what they are. More pandering with no substance.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    There are plenty of plans out there. Relying on the tactic of ignorance, and pretending that nothing has been offered is just plain dishonest.
    No, there isn't and that's the problem. There are empty promises of repealing Obama care and lowering corporate taxes. The problem isn't that corporations don't have enough money. They are sitting on trillions. Having a "R" in front of a name isn't going to take care of WHY people are losing their jobs and what needs to happen to get them back to work.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Isn't that what Bush said he was? So you want another Bush back?
    Bush socially liberal? Are you kidding me? The guy was Pro-Life, Anti-Gay marriage, anti-gays serving in the military. How in the hell do you get socially liberal? And fiscally conservative? I think you need to take another look before you claim that.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Huntsman is the closest Republican candidate that I would come close to voting for, however, I feel he is just pandering and like all the other candidates does not offer reasonable solutions to combating our high unemployment rate or shrinking middle class.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Sure there is....Even worked for Obama.
    No, it didn't. Because Obama was going against McCain, not Bush. The more appropriate comparison is that the GOP is doing now, what the Dems tried in 2004 and failed. However, have fun repeating the same mistakes. It will allow 4 more years of Obama.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Right....And many a prediction at this point comes out true....You'll excuse me if I think your prediction doesn't mean much....
    You're exxcused. However, when Obama wins don't come crying about it since you and others were informed of mistakes well in advance.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    It may have been poor wording, but I don't think I said you in particular were telling us who to pick, but rather in my opinion, all this talk of us choosing weak candidates is meant to what? Moan, and throw out empty opinion? Ok, type away.
    Conservatives and GOP didn't mind sticking their noses into Dem candidates and voicing their opinion so I don't see a reason why Dems and the left can't do the same regarding GOP candidates. Again, if you don't want to see it, don't read it.

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post

    Why is it that you libs have to try and be as childishly offensive as possible? Ah well, I'd rather be the 'teabagger' than the 'teabaggie' choke on that ok?

    j-mac
    Really? Have you read some of your posts regarding the left and some of the names you have used to erroneously describe the left as socialists, marxists, ect?

    If you can't take it, don't dish it.

  8. #1078
    Disappointed Evolutionist
    Catawba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    05-28-13 @ 08:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    27,254

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Can't really hold one party responsible for your own failures when you hold a super majority in both houses for 2/3 of the time period we are talking about.

    j-mac
    I look forward to you proving your fantastic claim.
    Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb

  9. #1079
    Sage
    whysoserious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Last Seen
    12-29-16 @ 03:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,170

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    I don't think the democrats had a super majority in recent times.

    -whysoserious
    Ted Cruz is the dumbest person alive.

  10. #1080
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,571

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Catawba View Post
    You are missing the larger point, that Obama is no progressive, and rather than having progressive to challenge Obama in a Primary, we have the OWS. In the absence of a progressive to challenge the centrist, Obama, I am so grateful the OWS is fulfilling that role.

    "progressive" is such a newspeak term, It indicates "progress", where many of those "progressive policies" would have a more regressive effect on society.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •