Page 102 of 136 FirstFirst ... 25292100101102103104112 ... LastLast
Results 1,011 to 1,020 of 1355

Thread: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

  1. #1011
    Sage
    AdamT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 04:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    17,773

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    They continued to shed jobs after his shovel ready stimulus plan was passed and continue to shed jobs today, 3 years later. How can there be less in the labor force today than three years ago? Don't we have a growing population?
    That's a flat-out lie. The economy has been adding jobs for 14 straight months. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

  2. #1012
    Sage
    AdamT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 04:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    17,773

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    You really don't have a clue and show it. In a private sector economy a leader would have gotten us out of the recession a lot quicker. That recession officially ended in June 2009 thus the economy was growing. There is less growth today than last year, fewer in the work force today, and a rising debt. Guess none of those things bother you
    You better get some windex; your crystal ball completely fogged.

  3. #1013
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 01:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,270

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamT View Post
    That's a flat-out lie. The economy has been adding jobs for 14 straight months. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
    You really have a passion for the failures of this President which says a lot about you. That job gain isn't a NET job gain. Do you know th edifference between net and gross?

  4. #1014
    Sage
    AdamT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 04:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    17,773

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    You really have a passion for the failures of this President which says a lot about you. That job gain isn't a NET job gain. Do you know th edifference between net and gross?
    It is a net job gain -- you're still lying and obviously desperate.

  5. #1015
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    11-22-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,858

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    You really don't have a clue and show it. In a private sector economy a leader would have gotten us out of the recession a lot quicker. That recession officially ended in June 2009 thus the economy was growing. There is less growth today than last year, fewer in the work force today, and a rising debt. Guess none of those things bother you
    Again, you argue government is the answer. I'm shocked by this.

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

  6. #1016
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 01:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,270

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamT View Post
    It is a net job gain -- you're still lying and obviously desperate.
    No, it isn't and I posted the private sector job growth to prove it

  7. #1017
    Sage
    AdamT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 04:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    17,773

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    No, it isn't and I posted the private sector job growth to prove it
    Yes, it is a lie and you didn't post **** to counter it.

  8. #1018
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The greatest city on Earth
    Last Seen
    08-04-12 @ 04:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    31,089

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    That is your opinion apparently meaning that the only valid context is yours. The proper context is this, we are three years into the Obama Administration and economic growth is lower in 2011 than it was in 2010. We still have a net job loss and unemployment rate much higher than when Obama took office. Waiting for exactly what the right context then is
    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    They continued to shed jobs after his shovel ready stimulus plan was passed and continue to shed jobs today, 3 years later. How can there be less in the labor force today than three years ago? Don't we have a growing population?
    again, since when did Conservatives start worrying about unemployment? the more people that are employed, the less money corporations have to pay dividends. this is why the stock market used to ALWAYS go down when unemployment went down.

  9. #1019
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 01:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,270

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamT View Post
    Yes, it is a lie and you didn't post **** to counter it.
    BLS says you are wrong. Get with Goldenboy and contact BLS and tell them their data is wrong because you believe it to be so.

    Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)
    Original Data Value

    Series Id: CES0500000001
    Seasonally Adjusted
    Super Sector: Total private
    Industry: Total private

    NAICS Code: -
    Data Type: ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS
    Years: 2001 to 2011

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
    2001 111634 111624 111555 111227 111146 110910 110737 110544 110276 109918 109575 109368
    2002 109214 109054 108989 108892 108814 108824 108732 108671 108659 108772 108758 108595
    2003 108640 108484 108286 108252 108274 108233 108231 108266 108421 108570 108611 108724
    2004 108882 108913 109213 109437 109747 109841 109883 109984 110135 110465 110493 110624
    2005 110718 110949 111095 111441 111583 111847 112122 112311 112392 112492 112796 112934
    2006 113247 113533 113795 113961 113965 114049 114200 114347 114432 114438 114628 114803
    2007 114993 115051 115251 115308 115419 115469 115486 115391 115396 115470 115568 115606
    2008 115610 115482 115395 115209 114969 114752 114487 114170 113736 113245 112458 111822
    2009 110981 110260 109473 108700 108374 107936 107649 107434 107221 106971 106937 106835
    2010 106793 106772 106916 107145 107193 107258 107351 107461 107570 107713 107841 108008
    2011 108102 108363 108582 108823 108922 108997 109170 109242 109462 109579 109719

    Looks to me, and of course I could be wrong, but 110,981 sure looks like it is larger than 109,719.

  10. #1020
    Sage
    presluc's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    9,932

    Re: Poll: Voters Viewing Occupy Wall St. Unfavorably

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Everyone of the employees that worked for me created value and worth for themselves. Many were promoted, many went on to open their own businesses, and many still are working for the company.
    What of the rest, for you did not say all,
    As far as that goes Enron could make the same claims about their past employees except no one would be working at Enron.

    I couldn't help notice in a previous post you mention 3 YEARS.
    Was it not 8 YEARS that started this economoc drain, 6 of which was with a Republican administration and a Republican Congress?

    If the blame game is what you choose play it properly please.

    As for me I care not about the mistakes of the past nor the mistakes of the present, if however America continues on this path , that effects the future of my country and myself, THAT I CARE ABOUT.
    Tiki bar regular.
    My code, never take anything for granted always expect the unexpexted.
    Never take anything you don't need ,never want anything you can't have

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •